Alternative Policy Rules and Post-Covid Fed Policies

Abstract The Revised Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy, adopted by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) in August 2020, contains two major changes from the original 2012 statement. Policy decisions would attempt to mitigate shortfalls, rather than deviations, of employment from its maximum level and the FOMC would implement Flexible Average Inflation Targeting (FAIT). In August 2025, the FOMC essentially returned to the 2012 statement. We develop and analyze policy rules consistent with the original and revised statements and show how prescriptions from inertial rules are much more in accord with Fed policy than prescriptions from non-inertial rules. The differences between non-inertial and inertial rules are much larger than the differences among various non-inertial and inertial rules. The prescriptions are identical between traditional and FAIT rules. The Fed policy following the Covid-19 recession is equally well described by rules in accord with the original 2012 statement as by rules in accord with the revised 2020 statement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economists Voice
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2025-0024
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternative Policy Rules and Post-Covid Fed Policies

David H. Papell, Ruxandra Prodan-Boul
The Economists Voice
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Alternative Policy Rules and Post-Covid Fed Policies

David H. Papell, Ruxandra Prodan-Boul
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Revised Statement on Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy, adopted by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) in August 2020, contains two major changes from the original 2012 statement. Policy decisions would attempt to mitigate shortfalls, rather than deviations, of employment from its maximum level and the FOMC would implement Flexible Average Inflation Targeting (FAIT). In August 2025, the FOMC essentially returned to the 2012 statement. We develop and analyze policy rules consistent with the original and revised statements and show how prescriptions from inertial rules are much more in accord with Fed policy than prescriptions from non-inertial rules. The differences between non-inertial and inertial rules are much larger than the differences among various non-inertial and inertial rules. The prescriptions are identical between traditional and FAIT rules. The Fed policy following the Covid-19 recession is equally well described by rules in accord with the original 2012 statement as by rules in accord with the revised 2020 statement.

The Economists VoiceVol. 22(2)
University of Houston (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.