Risk factors for screw loosening following lumbar interbody fusion surgery in degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Screw loosening (SL) is a common complication following lumbar interbody fusion (LIF), particularly for degenerative lumbar disease. This study investigated the risk factors for SL following LIF for degenerative lumbar disease and examined the clinical relevance of SL. A PROSPERO-registered systematic search was conducted in the ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane databases to identify longitudinal studies up to October 2024. Degenerative lumbar diseases included stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and disc herniation. Assessed risk factors were Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, screw length, fixation to the sacrum, fused levels, and Hounsfield units (HU). Twenty-two studies involving 3,689 participants (56%±5% female; mean age, 61.95±9.55 years) and 17,722 lumbar screws were analyzed. Overall, 10%±2% of screws exhibited loosening in 29%±5% of patients, with 5%±2% undergoing revision surgery. Patients with SL (SL group) and those without SL (non-SL group) had similar sex distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. The SL group had higher Visual Analog Scale scores for back pain (mean difference [MD], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-1.07; p<0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (MD, 3.34; 95% CI, 0.49-6.20; p=0.02), indicating the clinical relevance of SL. The SL group exhibited significantly higher Cobb angle (MD, 2.42; 95% CI, 0.36-4.49; p=0.02), lower LL angle (MD, -3.67; 95% CI, -6.33 to -1.01; p=0.01), and shorter screw length (MD, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.78 to -0.45; p=0.01). Fixation to the sacrum, increased fused levels, and decreased HU were significant risk factors. The area under the curve for HU was 0.80 (0.77-0.84), with a sensitivity of 0.74 (0.67-0.81) and specificity of 0.76 (0.66-0.84), underscoring notable prognostic value. Patients with SL exhibited higher Cobb angles, lower LL angles, and shorter screws. Fixation to sacrum, increased fused levels, and decreased HU were significant risk factors for SL (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024563780).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Spine Journal
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0142
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk factors for screw loosening following lumbar interbody fusion surgery in degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa, Bryan Gervais de Liyis, Made Dwinanda Prabawa Mahardana, Tjokorda Istri Putri Mahadewi
1 citations
Asian Spine Journal
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
article

Risk factors for screw loosening following lumbar interbody fusion surgery in degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa, Bryan Gervais de Liyis, Made Dwinanda Prabawa Mahardana, Tjokorda Istri Putri Mahadewi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Screw loosening (SL) is a common complication following lumbar interbody fusion (LIF), particularly for degenerative lumbar disease. This study investigated the risk factors for SL following LIF for degenerative lumbar disease and examined the clinical relevance of SL. A PROSPERO-registered systematic search was conducted in the ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, and Cochrane databases to identify longitudinal studies up to October 2024. Degenerative lumbar diseases included stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and disc herniation. Assessed risk factors were Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, screw length, fixation to the sacrum, fused levels, and Hounsfield units (HU). Twenty-two studies involving 3,689 participants (56%±5% female; mean age, 61.95±9.55 years) and 17,722 lumbar screws were analyzed. Overall, 10%±2% of screws exhibited loosening in 29%±5% of patients, with 5%±2% undergoing revision surgery. Patients with SL (SL group) and those without SL (non-SL group) had similar sex distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. The SL group had higher Visual Analog Scale scores for back pain (mean difference [MD], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-1.07; p<0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (MD, 3.34; 95% CI, 0.49-6.20; p=0.02), indicating the clinical relevance of SL. The SL group exhibited significantly higher Cobb angle (MD, 2.42; 95% CI, 0.36-4.49; p=0.02), lower LL angle (MD, -3.67; 95% CI, -6.33 to -1.01; p=0.01), and shorter screw length (MD, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.78 to -0.45; p=0.01). Fixation to the sacrum, increased fused levels, and decreased HU were significant risk factors. The area under the curve for HU was 0.80 (0.77-0.84), with a sensitivity of 0.74 (0.67-0.81) and specificity of 0.76 (0.66-0.84), underscoring notable prognostic value. Patients with SL exhibited higher Cobb angles, lower LL angles, and shorter screws. Fixation to sacrum, increased fused levels, and decreased HU were significant risk factors for SL (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024563780).

Asian Spine JournalVol. 19(6)
Udayana University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.