Building learning pathways to enhance education for sustainable development (ESD), quality and relevance

Purpose This study aims to demonstrate how integrating sustainable development into courses and degree programs can be systematically enhanced using a transparent method that ensures high quality and relevance. By presenting findings from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, this study addresses challenges in advancing education for sustainable development (ESD) at higher education institutions. Design/methodology/approach This study used action research methodology which is characterized as a reflective and collaborative inquiry. A new mapping tool was used to make sustainable development more visible in the program plans. The tool maps the learning outcomes to a set of sustainability criteria or to the UN sustainable development goals. Findings One important finding was the identification of different “sustainability tracks,” divided into “weak” or “strong” sustainability. A second finding was that processes and practices that support the integration of sustainable development in education were identified and correlated by both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Finally, three important areas to increase integration of sustainability were identified: understanding ESD in higher education; actors, stakeholders, processes and practices; tools and labelling. Research limitations/implications This study analyzed only six degree programs, which may restrict the generalizability of the findings across the entire university curriculum or to other institutions. Originality/value This study uniquely connects sustainable development in higher education to systematic labelling of sustainability within degree programs, enhancing transparency, coherence and student engagement. The labelling framework supports curriculum development, promotes institutional growth and ensures traceability, fostering the integration and progression of sustainability competences across courses and programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-10-2024-0764
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building learning pathways to enhance education for sustainable development (ESD), quality and relevance

Eddi Omrcen, Johan Boman, Andreas Hanning, Kassahun Weldemariam et al.
5 citations
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Sustainability in Higher Education
44.63
article

Building learning pathways to enhance education for sustainable development (ESD), quality and relevance

Eddi Omrcen, Johan Boman, Andreas Hanning, Kassahun Weldemariam, Johan Lodin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to demonstrate how integrating sustainable development into courses and degree programs can be systematically enhanced using a transparent method that ensures high quality and relevance. By presenting findings from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, this study addresses challenges in advancing education for sustainable development (ESD) at higher education institutions. Design/methodology/approach This study used action research methodology which is characterized as a reflective and collaborative inquiry. A new mapping tool was used to make sustainable development more visible in the program plans. The tool maps the learning outcomes to a set of sustainability criteria or to the UN sustainable development goals. Findings One important finding was the identification of different “sustainability tracks,” divided into “weak” or “strong” sustainability. A second finding was that processes and practices that support the integration of sustainable development in education were identified and correlated by both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Finally, three important areas to increase integration of sustainability were identified: understanding ESD in higher education; actors, stakeholders, processes and practices; tools and labelling. Research limitations/implications This study analyzed only six degree programs, which may restrict the generalizability of the findings across the entire university curriculum or to other institutions. Originality/value This study uniquely connects sustainable development in higher education to systematic labelling of sustainability within degree programs, enhancing transparency, coherence and student engagement. The labelling framework supports curriculum development, promotes institutional growth and ensures traceability, fostering the integration and progression of sustainability competences across courses and programs.

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher EducationVol. 26(9)
Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs – Abderhamane Baba Touré (ML), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Sustainability in Higher Education
44.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.