<b>Comparison Of Urine Leukocyte Examination In Patients With Urinary Tract Infections (Utis) Using The Dipstick And Microscopic Methods In The Working Area Of Klasaman Health Center</b>

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common type of infection caused by the growth of microorganisms in the human urinary tract. Leukocytes are a component of the immune system that fight infection and inflammation. The methods commonly used for urine leukocyte examination are the dipstick and microscopic methods.Objective: This study aims to compare the results of urine leukocyte examination between the dipstick and microscopic methods in UTI patients.Methods: This research is descriptive comparative with a cross-sectional design. The study was conducted at Puskesmas Klasaman and the TLM Laboratory of STIKES Papua from June 28 to August 21, 2024. The study population includes all UTI patients at Puskesmas Klasaman, Sorong City, totaling 16 patients, with a sample of 16 urine samples from patients confirmed positive for UTI, selected using a total sampling technique. The data collected were entered into a master table and analyzed statistically.Results: The results of the urine leukocyte examination using the dipstick method showed that the majority of respondents had results of approximately 70 leukocytes/µl (+1), while the results from the microscopic method indicated that the majority had 5-9 cells/HPF (+2). This study found a significant difference between the results of urine leukocyte examination using the dipstick and microscopic methods (p-value < 0.05) using the nonparametric Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (WSRT).Conclusion: There is a significant difference in the results of urine leukocyte examination between the dipstick and microscopic methods, where the dipstick method is more practical but less accurate compared to the more detailed and accurate microscopic method. It is recommended to explore other urine examination methods and compare the results with a larger sample to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Nursing and Health Care
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64914/g6tr4e86
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Urine Leukocyte Examination In Patients With Urinary Tract Infections (Utis) Using The Dipstick And Microscopic Methods In The Working Area Of Klasaman Health Center

Junaiddin Junaiddin, Evi Hudriyah Hukom, Andirwana Andirwana, S. Gunawan et al.
Indonesian Journal of Nursing and Health Care
Urinary Tract Infections Management
article

Comparison Of Urine Leukocyte Examination In Patients With Urinary Tract Infections (Utis) Using The Dipstick And Microscopic Methods In The Working Area Of Klasaman Health Center

Junaiddin Junaiddin, Evi Hudriyah Hukom, Andirwana Andirwana, S. Gunawan, Sakinah Sarnia Iriani Lihawa, Muhamad Faisal Arianto, Sabila
article en

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common type of infection caused by the growth of microorganisms in the human urinary tract. Leukocytes are a component of the immune system that fight infection and inflammation. The methods commonly used for urine leukocyte examination are the dipstick and microscopic methods.Objective: This study aims to compare the results of urine leukocyte examination between the dipstick and microscopic methods in UTI patients.Methods: This research is descriptive comparative with a cross-sectional design. The study was conducted at Puskesmas Klasaman and the TLM Laboratory of STIKES Papua from June 28 to August 21, 2024. The study population includes all UTI patients at Puskesmas Klasaman, Sorong City, totaling 16 patients, with a sample of 16 urine samples from patients confirmed positive for UTI, selected using a total sampling technique. The data collected were entered into a master table and analyzed statistically.Results: The results of the urine leukocyte examination using the dipstick method showed that the majority of respondents had results of approximately 70 leukocytes/µl (+1), while the results from the microscopic method indicated that the majority had 5-9 cells/HPF (+2). This study found a significant difference between the results of urine leukocyte examination using the dipstick and microscopic methods (p-value < 0.05) using the nonparametric Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (WSRT).Conclusion: There is a significant difference in the results of urine leukocyte examination between the dipstick and microscopic methods, where the dipstick method is more practical but less accurate compared to the more detailed and accurate microscopic method. It is recommended to explore other urine examination methods and compare the results with a larger sample to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Indonesian Journal of Nursing and Health CareVol. 2(1: February)
State University of Papua (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.