Data from Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer

<div>Abstract<p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use are standard for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), leading to improved outcomes. However, due to a lack of predictive biomarkers, the presence or absence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) is currently used as a predictive factor in clinical practice. To elucidate the impact of irAEs on efficacy, a cohort of patients with mRCC who received ICI-based combination therapy as initial treatment was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received dual-ICI therapy (ICI–ICI, <i>N</i> = 55) or ICI and TKI therapy (ICI–TKI, <i>N</i> = 55). Subsequent to this initial categorization, each group was further subdivided based on the presence or absence of irAEs. In the ICI–ICI group, patients with irAEs exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [PFS; OS (median): not reached vs. 17.9 months, <i>P</i> = 0.03/PFS (median): 51.4 vs. 5.8 months, <i>P</i> < 0.01]. Conversely, no such correlation was observed between irAEs and OS/PFS in the ICI–TKI group. [OS (median): 26.3 months vs. not reached, <i>P</i> = 0.73/PFS (median): 16.8 months vs. 11.9 months, <i>P</i> = 0.38] Furthermore, treatment discontinuation due to AEs accounted for 65% (<i>N</i> = 32) in the ICI–ICI group and 57% (<i>N</i> = 24) in the ICI–TKI group, with a slightly higher tendency observed in the ICI–ICI group. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of irAEs may differ depending on the treatment combination, and further basic research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.</p>Significance:<p>In patients with mRCC who received ICI–ICI, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with improved survival outcomes, whereas no such association was observed in patients who received ICI–TKI. This suggests that irAEs may reflect the favorable immune response specific to ICI–ICI therapy, whereas differences in the tumor microenvironment, particularly involving neutrophils, in ICI–TKI patients may influence treatment response.</p></div>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.c.8043424
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data from Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer

Shuya Kandori, Hiromichi Sakurai, Bunpei Isoda, Hiromitsu Negoro et al.
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Data from Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer

Shuya Kandori, Hiromichi Sakurai, Bunpei Isoda, Hiromitsu Negoro, Bryan J. Mathis, Takamitsu Inoue, Akira Joraku, Tomoki Ishida, Masanobu Shiga, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Masahiro Iinuma, Manabu Komine, Masakazu Tsutsumi, Shigeru Takahashi, K Tanaka, Akifumi Omiya, Kotoe Matsuda, Jun Miyazaki
article en

Abstract

<div>Abstract<p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use are standard for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), leading to improved outcomes. However, due to a lack of predictive biomarkers, the presence or absence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) is currently used as a predictive factor in clinical practice. To elucidate the impact of irAEs on efficacy, a cohort of patients with mRCC who received ICI-based combination therapy as initial treatment was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received dual-ICI therapy (ICI–ICI, <i>N</i> = 55) or ICI and TKI therapy (ICI–TKI, <i>N</i> = 55). Subsequent to this initial categorization, each group was further subdivided based on the presence or absence of irAEs. In the ICI–ICI group, patients with irAEs exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [PFS; OS (median): not reached vs. 17.9 months, <i>P</i> = 0.03/PFS (median): 51.4 vs. 5.8 months, <i>P</i> < 0.01]. Conversely, no such correlation was observed between irAEs and OS/PFS in the ICI–TKI group. [OS (median): 26.3 months vs. not reached, <i>P</i> = 0.73/PFS (median): 16.8 months vs. 11.9 months, <i>P</i> = 0.38] Furthermore, treatment discontinuation due to AEs accounted for 65% (<i>N</i> = 32) in the ICI–ICI group and 57% (<i>N</i> = 24) in the ICI–TKI group, with a slightly higher tendency observed in the ICI–ICI group. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of irAEs may differ depending on the treatment combination, and further basic research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.</p>Significance:<p>In patients with mRCC who received ICI–ICI, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with improved survival outcomes, whereas no such association was observed in patients who received ICI–TKI. This suggests that irAEs may reflect the favorable immune response specific to ICI–ICI therapy, whereas differences in the tumor microenvironment, particularly involving neutrophils, in ICI–TKI patients may influence treatment response.</p></div>

Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.