Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease—treatment standard

We review the current standards of treatment and discuss novel developments in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, outcome prediction and management of anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease. Anti-GBM disease is a unique form of small vessel vasculitis affecting the glomerular and pulmonary capillaries. It is caused by autoantibodies directed against the α3 chain of type IV collagen, leading to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis with pulmonary haemorrhage in ∼50% of cases. Diagnosis relies on clinical features, kidney biopsy showing linear IgG deposition along the GBM, and/or detection of circulating anti-GBM antibodies. Historically, untreated disease was rapidly fatal, but the introduction of plasma exchange combined with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids has significantly improved outcomes, particularly in patients who are not dialysis-dependent at presentation. Dialysis-dependent patients have a lower likelihood of renal recovery, and treatment decisions must consider biopsy findings, clinical severity and potential contraindications to standard immunosuppression. Unlike anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, relapses are rare in classic anti-GBM disease, and long-term maintenance immunosuppression is not routinely required. However, 'double positive' patients (anti-GBM and ANCA) have a higher relapse risk and require maintenance immunosuppressive treatment. Atypical anti-GBM presentations, including seronegative cases, are now better recognized but their optimal management remains unclear. Future research should define the use of oral versus intravenous cyclophosphamide in anti-GBM disease, clarify the role of rituximab and determine the place of emerging therapies such as imlifidase. Advances in risk stratification and ongoing trials are expected to inform treatment individualization and to improve treatment approaches for this aggressive autoimmune disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf190
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Vasculitis and related conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease—treatment standard

Stephen P. McAdoo, Charles D. Pusey
2 citations
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Vasculitis and related conditions
3.04
article

Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease—treatment standard

Stephen P. McAdoo, Charles D. Pusey
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We review the current standards of treatment and discuss novel developments in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, outcome prediction and management of anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease. Anti-GBM disease is a unique form of small vessel vasculitis affecting the glomerular and pulmonary capillaries. It is caused by autoantibodies directed against the α3 chain of type IV collagen, leading to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis with pulmonary haemorrhage in ∼50% of cases. Diagnosis relies on clinical features, kidney biopsy showing linear IgG deposition along the GBM, and/or detection of circulating anti-GBM antibodies. Historically, untreated disease was rapidly fatal, but the introduction of plasma exchange combined with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids has significantly improved outcomes, particularly in patients who are not dialysis-dependent at presentation. Dialysis-dependent patients have a lower likelihood of renal recovery, and treatment decisions must consider biopsy findings, clinical severity and potential contraindications to standard immunosuppression. Unlike anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, relapses are rare in classic anti-GBM disease, and long-term maintenance immunosuppression is not routinely required. However, 'double positive' patients (anti-GBM and ANCA) have a higher relapse risk and require maintenance immunosuppressive treatment. Atypical anti-GBM presentations, including seronegative cases, are now better recognized but their optimal management remains unclear. Future research should define the use of oral versus intravenous cyclophosphamide in anti-GBM disease, clarify the role of rituximab and determine the place of emerging therapies such as imlifidase. Advances in risk stratification and ongoing trials are expected to inform treatment individualization and to improve treatment approaches for this aggressive autoimmune disease.

Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationVol. 41(1)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Vasculitis and related conditions
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.