Partisan identity, ideological orientations, and the differential criticisms of ingroup and outgroup leadership: An examination of the 2024 U.S. election

Abstract Do partisans ever oppose their candidates during U.S. presidential elections? We explored this question across two studies ( N = 1106) using U.S. Republicans and Democrats in the context of the 2024 Presidential Election. We propose that partisan identity and ideological orientations related to different criticisms of in‐group and out‐group leaders, which differently relates to level of candidate support. For Democrats, we focused on the ideological orientation of left‐wing authoritarianism (LWA). For Republicans, we focused on the ideological belief in democracy. Study 1 measured participants criticisms of in‐group and out‐group candidates, while Study 2 manipulated the salience of in‐group (or out‐group) leadership support. Across both studies, stronger partisan identity related to lower levels of in‐group criticism, higher levels of out‐group criticism, and more leadership support. Importantly, the examined ideological orientation lead Democrats (but not Republicans) to oppose their in‐group leader. Manipulating the salience of leadership support did not impact these relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.70033
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partisan identity, ideological orientations, and the differential criticisms of ingroup and outgroup leadership: An examination of the 2024 U.S. election

Joseph A. Wagoner, Yani Yakob
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Partisan identity, ideological orientations, and the differential criticisms of ingroup and outgroup leadership: An examination of the 2024 U.S. election

Joseph A. Wagoner, Yani Yakob
article en

Abstract

Abstract Do partisans ever oppose their candidates during U.S. presidential elections? We explored this question across two studies ( N = 1106) using U.S. Republicans and Democrats in the context of the 2024 Presidential Election. We propose that partisan identity and ideological orientations related to different criticisms of in‐group and out‐group leaders, which differently relates to level of candidate support. For Democrats, we focused on the ideological orientation of left‐wing authoritarianism (LWA). For Republicans, we focused on the ideological belief in democracy. Study 1 measured participants criticisms of in‐group and out‐group candidates, while Study 2 manipulated the salience of in‐group (or out‐group) leadership support. Across both studies, stronger partisan identity related to lower levels of in‐group criticism, higher levels of out‐group criticism, and more leadership support. Importantly, the examined ideological orientation lead Democrats (but not Republicans) to oppose their in‐group leader. Manipulating the salience of leadership support did not impact these relationships.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 25(3)
University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.