Validation of MODELCODE 2020 approach for corroded rebars in R.C. beam elements

Abstract The prediction of the structural behavior of corroded reinforced concrete elements is a topical issue in the research field, far from being assessed, even if the corrosion consequences at local and global levels are well known. The definition of analytical or numerical models is typically addressed with two different strategies. The first one, also suggested in ModelCode 2020, assumes that the corrosion effects can be accounted for, in a simplified engineering approach, considering the nominal uncorroded area and modifying the constitutive law of the steel rebar, by means of decay laws of the mechanical properties, that is, yielding strength, ultimate strength, and ultimate strain. According to another strategy, corrosion is simulated by considering a reduction of the rebar area and a decay of the ultimate strain. The paper aims to compare the two modeling approaches applied to analytical models, through a comparison with experimental results both developed by the authors and available in the literature, in order to highlight their peculiar characteristics, range of applicability, and safety levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70327
Primary Topic
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of MODELCODE 2020 approach for corroded rebars in R.C. beam elements

Zila Rinaldi, Fabio Di Carlo, Alberto Meda
Structural Concrete
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
article

Validation of MODELCODE 2020 approach for corroded rebars in R.C. beam elements

Zila Rinaldi, Fabio Di Carlo, Alberto Meda
article en

Abstract

Abstract The prediction of the structural behavior of corroded reinforced concrete elements is a topical issue in the research field, far from being assessed, even if the corrosion consequences at local and global levels are well known. The definition of analytical or numerical models is typically addressed with two different strategies. The first one, also suggested in ModelCode 2020, assumes that the corrosion effects can be accounted for, in a simplified engineering approach, considering the nominal uncorroded area and modifying the constitutive law of the steel rebar, by means of decay laws of the mechanical properties, that is, yielding strength, ultimate strength, and ultimate strain. According to another strategy, corrosion is simulated by considering a reduction of the rebar area and a decay of the ultimate strain. The paper aims to compare the two modeling approaches applied to analytical models, through a comparison with experimental results both developed by the authors and available in the literature, in order to highlight their peculiar characteristics, range of applicability, and safety levels.

Structural Concrete
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Concrete Corrosion and Durability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.