Ecohydrological feedbacks increase water storage, streamflow and resilience of natural peatlands

• A model ( pecosim) was developed to simulate peatland water storage and streamflow. • We quantify the impact of ecohydrological feedbacks on water storage and -release. • Ecohydrological feedbacks promote hydrological resilience of natural peatlands. • Feedbacks triple water storage and quadruple streamflow in the growing season. • Scientific support for feedbacks as key mechanisms underlying ecosystem services. Peatlands are hypothesized to enhance water storage, sustain baseflow, and mitigate drought impact at the landscape level. The importance of ecohydrological feedbacks for the peatland water cycle and the interaction with surrounding landscapes is, however, poorly understood. This thin scientific basis hinders effective land- and water management and understanding peatland restoration impacts on regional hydrology. We developed the pecosim model ( pe atland eco hydrology and s treamflow sim ulator) to quantify the impact of three ecohydrological feedbacks on streamflow and water storage: (1) the transmissivity feedback (2) elastic storage and (3) water table depth (WTD) – evapotranspiration feedback. Validation with seven years of hourly observations from Degerö Stormyr, an oligotrophic fen in northern Sweden, confirms strong model performance for growing season WTD and streamflow (Kling Gupta Model Efficiency: 0.88 and 0.87). Using PECOSIM we show the synergy of all ecohydrological feedbacks quadruples growing season streamflow (66 mm vs 16 mm without feedbacks) and maintains a shallower, more stable WTD (0.13 m vs 0.55 m). Without feedbacks, ‘active’ streamflow generating storage during the growing season was absent (0 mm), whereas the feedbacks together provide 63 mm streamflow generating storage. The three feedbacks additionally sustain streamflow and storage regimes under water stress, boosting drought resilience of natural peatlands and their surrounding landscape. This study provides scientific support for the crucial role of ecohydrological feedbacks in natural peatlands and highlights their function as nature-based solution by increasing water storage and baseflow. Degradation of natural peatlands will diminish feedback efficiency, and compromise peatland ecosystem services vital for sustainable water management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134282
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecohydrological feedbacks increase water storage, streamflow and resilience of natural peatlands

Kevin Bishop, Jelmer Nijp, Mats B. Nilsson, Reinert Huseby Karlsen
1 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
article

Ecohydrological feedbacks increase water storage, streamflow and resilience of natural peatlands

Kevin Bishop, Jelmer Nijp, Mats B. Nilsson, Reinert Huseby Karlsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• A model ( pecosim) was developed to simulate peatland water storage and streamflow. • We quantify the impact of ecohydrological feedbacks on water storage and -release. • Ecohydrological feedbacks promote hydrological resilience of natural peatlands. • Feedbacks triple water storage and quadruple streamflow in the growing season. • Scientific support for feedbacks as key mechanisms underlying ecosystem services. Peatlands are hypothesized to enhance water storage, sustain baseflow, and mitigate drought impact at the landscape level. The importance of ecohydrological feedbacks for the peatland water cycle and the interaction with surrounding landscapes is, however, poorly understood. This thin scientific basis hinders effective land- and water management and understanding peatland restoration impacts on regional hydrology. We developed the pecosim model ( pe atland eco hydrology and s treamflow sim ulator) to quantify the impact of three ecohydrological feedbacks on streamflow and water storage: (1) the transmissivity feedback (2) elastic storage and (3) water table depth (WTD) – evapotranspiration feedback. Validation with seven years of hourly observations from Degerö Stormyr, an oligotrophic fen in northern Sweden, confirms strong model performance for growing season WTD and streamflow (Kling Gupta Model Efficiency: 0.88 and 0.87). Using PECOSIM we show the synergy of all ecohydrological feedbacks quadruples growing season streamflow (66 mm vs 16 mm without feedbacks) and maintains a shallower, more stable WTD (0.13 m vs 0.55 m). Without feedbacks, ‘active’ streamflow generating storage during the growing season was absent (0 mm), whereas the feedbacks together provide 63 mm streamflow generating storage. The three feedbacks additionally sustain streamflow and storage regimes under water stress, boosting drought resilience of natural peatlands and their surrounding landscape. This study provides scientific support for the crucial role of ecohydrological feedbacks in natural peatlands and highlights their function as nature-based solution by increasing water storage and baseflow. Degradation of natural peatlands will diminish feedback efficiency, and compromise peatland ecosystem services vital for sustainable water management.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 664
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (SE), KWR Water Research Institute (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Naturvårdsverket, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.