EXPRESS: A Short History of Misinformation-at-scale and Efforts to Mitigate It

This article traces the social construction of misinformation-at-scale by charting the diverse content moderation methods adopted by social media companies between 2016-2021, when perceptions about social media harming public health and political outcomes became a major public issue. The concept of “misinformation” refers to false or inaccurate information. Misinformation-at scale occurs when false information is amplified online and shared by politicians, journalists, public figures, or other densely networked actors, whose engagement turns false claims into public controversies. This situation creates a paradox for social media companies and their users. On the one hand, the business model of social media companies is to increase engagement without consideration of the veracity of the content. As a result, content moderation methods have focused on reducing the speed and scale of misinformation, but not rooting it out entirely. On the other hand, users increasingly depend on social media companies for access to TALK (timely, accurate, local knowledge), which is difficult to discover, especially during breaking news or on contested subjects. This paper documents this history and discusses ways to address this challenge posed by misinformation-at-scale.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156251384249
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPRESS: A Short History of Misinformation-at-scale and Efforts to Mitigate It

Joan Donovan
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

EXPRESS: A Short History of Misinformation-at-scale and Efforts to Mitigate It

Joan Donovan
article en

Abstract

This article traces the social construction of misinformation-at-scale by charting the diverse content moderation methods adopted by social media companies between 2016-2021, when perceptions about social media harming public health and political outcomes became a major public issue. The concept of “misinformation” refers to false or inaccurate information. Misinformation-at scale occurs when false information is amplified online and shared by politicians, journalists, public figures, or other densely networked actors, whose engagement turns false claims into public controversies. This situation creates a paradox for social media companies and their users. On the one hand, the business model of social media companies is to increase engagement without consideration of the veracity of the content. As a result, content moderation methods have focused on reducing the speed and scale of misinformation, but not rooting it out entirely. On the other hand, users increasingly depend on social media companies for access to TALK (timely, accurate, local knowledge), which is difficult to discover, especially during breaking news or on contested subjects. This paper documents this history and discusses ways to address this challenge posed by misinformation-at-scale.

Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.