How to Co-Produce Elderly Care: Volunteer Coordination by Municipalities or Voluntary Organisations?

This study increases our understanding of coordination in co-production in elderly care as we explore models of co-production where voluntary organisations recruit and coordinate individual volunteers and where municipalities assume this role. We examine these models of co-production informed by an analytic framework where we combine third-sector and co-production theory. Based on 30 qualitative interviews with public and voluntary sector representatives within elderly care in four Norwegian municipalities, we find that additional resource mobilisation is the primary benefit of municipal coordination. Municipalities that coordinate citizens directly and independently of voluntary organisations consider this to increase the overall number of volunteers. A disadvantage of municipal volunteerism is that it may replace traditional voluntary organisation activity, weakening civil society’s role as critical correctives and providers of special expertise. Policymakers must take such trade-offs into account when choosing co-production models with or without voluntary organisations as coordinating actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640251374272
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Co-Produce Elderly Care: Volunteer Coordination by Municipalities or Voluntary Organisations?

Håkon Solbu Trætteberg, Tord Skogedal Lindén
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

How to Co-Produce Elderly Care: Volunteer Coordination by Municipalities or Voluntary Organisations?

Håkon Solbu Trætteberg, Tord Skogedal Lindén
article en

Abstract

This study increases our understanding of coordination in co-production in elderly care as we explore models of co-production where voluntary organisations recruit and coordinate individual volunteers and where municipalities assume this role. We examine these models of co-production informed by an analytic framework where we combine third-sector and co-production theory. Based on 30 qualitative interviews with public and voluntary sector representatives within elderly care in four Norwegian municipalities, we find that additional resource mobilisation is the primary benefit of municipal coordination. Municipalities that coordinate citizens directly and independently of voluntary organisations consider this to increase the overall number of volunteers. A disadvantage of municipal volunteerism is that it may replace traditional voluntary organisation activity, weakening civil society’s role as critical correctives and providers of special expertise. Policymakers must take such trade-offs into account when choosing co-production models with or without voluntary organisations as coordinating actors.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
NORCE Research AS (NO), Institute for Social Research (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.