Systematic review: Cutaneous flaps

Background: Cutaneous flaps are essential in reconstructive surgery for managing soft tissue defects. Their selection depends on defect location, size, and vascular supply. Objective: To systematically review the clinical applications, outcomes, and complications of cutaneous flaps. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies from 2013–2025 evaluating cutaneous flap techniques. Studies reporting clinical outcomes in humans were included. Results: 52 studies were included. Local flaps demonstrated high survival rates with minimal complications. Free flaps were preferred for large defects but had higher risk of partial necrosis and donor site morbidity. Conclusion: Proper selection of flap type optimizes functional and aesthetic outcomes. Further high-quality trials are needed to standardize indications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.23.3.0821
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review: Cutaneous flaps

Roberto Heliodoro Sanabia Orejel
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

Systematic review: Cutaneous flaps

Roberto Heliodoro Sanabia Orejel
article en

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous flaps are essential in reconstructive surgery for managing soft tissue defects. Their selection depends on defect location, size, and vascular supply. Objective: To systematically review the clinical applications, outcomes, and complications of cutaneous flaps. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies from 2013–2025 evaluating cutaneous flap techniques. Studies reporting clinical outcomes in humans were included. Results: 52 studies were included. Local flaps demonstrated high survival rates with minimal complications. Free flaps were preferred for large defects but had higher risk of partial necrosis and donor site morbidity. Conclusion: Proper selection of flap type optimizes functional and aesthetic outcomes. Further high-quality trials are needed to standardize indications.

World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health SciencesVol. 23(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systematic review: Cutaneous flaps — Roberto Heliodoro Sanabia Orejel · World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS