Development, validation and reliability of the Coach Feedback Analysis System

This study aims to document the development of the Coach Feedback Analysis System (CFAS) and to detail the establishment of its validity and reliability. The CFAS consists of six categories and eighteen feedback types that help to systematically describe how coaches provide feedback in on- and off-field coaching contexts (practice, competition and video review). The validity and reliability process involved the analysis of 600 minutes of footage from these contexts across four different team sports (hurling (indigenous Irish sport), football, Australian Rules football and women's rugby union) (teams observed were male unless specified) and a variety of competitive levels (amateur, academy and professional) and age groups (u14, u16, adult). The face validity process conducted with a panel of coaching experts provided agreement that the CFAS was a valid instrument. The inter- and intra-observer reliability process also resulted in above acceptable levels of agreement between observers. It is suggested that the CFAS may be used as a coach development aid by helping to develop greater awareness between behavioural intentions and actions of how feedback is used in a variety of coaching contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2561346
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development, validation and reliability of the Coach Feedback Analysis System

Lisa Ryan, R H Corbett, Mark Partington, R. Mason et al.
Journal of Sports Sciences
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Development, validation and reliability of the Coach Feedback Analysis System

Lisa Ryan, R H Corbett, Mark Partington, R. Mason, Ed Cope, Evan Gannon
article en

Abstract

This study aims to document the development of the Coach Feedback Analysis System (CFAS) and to detail the establishment of its validity and reliability. The CFAS consists of six categories and eighteen feedback types that help to systematically describe how coaches provide feedback in on- and off-field coaching contexts (practice, competition and video review). The validity and reliability process involved the analysis of 600 minutes of footage from these contexts across four different team sports (hurling (indigenous Irish sport), football, Australian Rules football and women's rugby union) (teams observed were male unless specified) and a variety of competitive levels (amateur, academy and professional) and age groups (u14, u16, adult). The face validity process conducted with a panel of coaching experts provided agreement that the CFAS was a valid instrument. The inter- and intra-observer reliability process also resulted in above acceptable levels of agreement between observers. It is suggested that the CFAS may be used as a coach development aid by helping to develop greater awareness between behavioural intentions and actions of how feedback is used in a variety of coaching contexts.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 43(22)
Loughborough University (GB), Edge Hill University (GB), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Australian Football League (AU), COPE Galway (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development, validation and reliability of the Coach Feedback Analysis System — Lisa Ryan, R H Corbett, et al. · Journal of Sports Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS