Comparative assessment of species identification methods for European Salicornia sources: a multifaceted approach employing morphology, nuclear DNA content, phylogenetic markers, RNA topology, and SSR fingerprinting

Accurate identification of <i>Salicornia</i> species is a fundamental prerequisite for their potential usability and domestication. This study utilized a multifaceted methodological approach integrating morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular techniques to identify species from available European <i>Salicornia</i> sources. The following methods were compared: nuclear DNA content analysis; application of marker-based DNA barcoding via four common <i>Salicornia</i> markers; investigations of RNA topologies of these marker sequences by predicting theoretical secondary structures; utilization of diagnostic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions within the external transcribed spacer (ETS) marker sequences for European <i>Salicornia</i> taxa; comparison of three promising microsatellite (SSR) markers regarding their ability to differentiate <i>Salicornia</i> subspecies; and evaluation of morphological data on habitus and flower characteristics utilizing a <i>Salicornia</i> identification key. The results demonstrate that ETS marker analysis offers reliable and cost-effective species determination, with SNP comparisons being more user friendly than phylogenetic trees are, and microsatellite markers can be differentiated down to the subspecies level via fragment length differences. However, microsatellite analysis alone is not suitable for primary species identification. DNA content can provide a rough estimation of potential species and is already more reliable than morphological methods. The differentiation among species is crucial for creating transparency for farmers and consumers and for initiating breeding processes, particularly within the context of frequent misidentification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1666009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of species identification methods for European Salicornia sources: a multifaceted approach employing morphology, nuclear DNA content, phylogenetic markers, RNA topology, and SSR fingerprinting

Traud Winkelmann, Jutta Papenbrock, Andre Fussy, Samuele Austoni
2 citations
Frontiers in Plant Science
Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
2.30
article

Comparative assessment of species identification methods for European Salicornia sources: a multifaceted approach employing morphology, nuclear DNA content, phylogenetic markers, RNA topology, and SSR fingerprinting

Traud Winkelmann, Jutta Papenbrock, Andre Fussy, Samuele Austoni
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurate identification of <i>Salicornia</i> species is a fundamental prerequisite for their potential usability and domestication. This study utilized a multifaceted methodological approach integrating morphological, cytogenetic, and molecular techniques to identify species from available European <i>Salicornia</i> sources. The following methods were compared: nuclear DNA content analysis; application of marker-based DNA barcoding via four common <i>Salicornia</i> markers; investigations of RNA topologies of these marker sequences by predicting theoretical secondary structures; utilization of diagnostic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions within the external transcribed spacer (ETS) marker sequences for European <i>Salicornia</i> taxa; comparison of three promising microsatellite (SSR) markers regarding their ability to differentiate <i>Salicornia</i> subspecies; and evaluation of morphological data on habitus and flower characteristics utilizing a <i>Salicornia</i> identification key. The results demonstrate that ETS marker analysis offers reliable and cost-effective species determination, with SNP comparisons being more user friendly than phylogenetic trees are, and microsatellite markers can be differentiated down to the subspecies level via fragment length differences. However, microsatellite analysis alone is not suitable for primary species identification. DNA content can provide a rough estimation of potential species and is already more reliable than morphological methods. The differentiation among species is crucial for creating transparency for farmers and consumers and for initiating breeding processes, particularly within the context of frequent misidentification.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), University of Milan (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
2.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.