Findings From the Great British and Northern Ireland Botulinum Toxin Survey: Treatment Outcomes, Patient Experience, and Regulations From a Cross-Sectional Survey

Abstract Background Given rising demand for botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatments and limited data on safety, ethics, and regulation, a national survey explored experiences with cosmetic BoNT in the United Kingdom. Objectives To conduct a national observational survey with the aim to capture real-world experiences of cosmetic BoNT in the United Kingdom. Methods A cross-sectional online survey gathered data on experiences with cosmetic BoNT injections across the United Kingdom. Participation was open to adults (≥18 years) who had received cosmetic BoNT treatment. Results A total of 919 participants completed the survey and were predominantly female, white, and had a high household income. Commonly reported acute complications were bruising/swelling (26.1%), and headache (24.7%). Commonly reported long-term complications were BoNT resistance (2.9%), social withdrawal (2.7%), nerve damage (2.5%), and dry eyes/vision problems (2.5%). In total, 66% stated their treatment was administered by a prescriber, 28% said it was not. Among those treated by a non-prescriber, 40% reported that a prescriber was present during the consultation, 42% said no prescriber was present, and 17% were unsure. Surprisingly, a few had not signed a consent form (8%), 11% were not informed of treatment risks, and 18% were not told how to respond to complications. A large majority expressed support for enhanced oversight, with 57.8% favoring significantly stricter regulation, and 31.3% somewhat stricter regulation. Conclusions Cosmetic BoNT can offer high satisfaction and a favorable safety profile when administered appropriately. However, findings highlight key vulnerabilities: inconsistent practitioner qualifications, gaps in informed consent, insufficient complication support, and weak regulation. Level of Evidence:3 (Therapeutic)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf115
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Findings From the Great British and Northern Ireland Botulinum Toxin Survey: Treatment Outcomes, Patient Experience, and Regulations From a Cross-Sectional Survey

Dong Keon Yon, Julia Gawronska, Roshan Ravindran, Lee Smith et al.
1 citations
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
1.39
article

Findings From the Great British and Northern Ireland Botulinum Toxin Survey: Treatment Outcomes, Patient Experience, and Regulations From a Cross-Sectional Survey

Dong Keon Yon, Julia Gawronska, Roshan Ravindran, Lee Smith, Damiano Pizzol, Yvonne Barnett, Masoud Rahmati, José Francisco López‐Gil, Helen Keyes, Laurie Butler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Given rising demand for botulinum toxin (BoNT) treatments and limited data on safety, ethics, and regulation, a national survey explored experiences with cosmetic BoNT in the United Kingdom. Objectives To conduct a national observational survey with the aim to capture real-world experiences of cosmetic BoNT in the United Kingdom. Methods A cross-sectional online survey gathered data on experiences with cosmetic BoNT injections across the United Kingdom. Participation was open to adults (≥18 years) who had received cosmetic BoNT treatment. Results A total of 919 participants completed the survey and were predominantly female, white, and had a high household income. Commonly reported acute complications were bruising/swelling (26.1%), and headache (24.7%). Commonly reported long-term complications were BoNT resistance (2.9%), social withdrawal (2.7%), nerve damage (2.5%), and dry eyes/vision problems (2.5%). In total, 66% stated their treatment was administered by a prescriber, 28% said it was not. Among those treated by a non-prescriber, 40% reported that a prescriber was present during the consultation, 42% said no prescriber was present, and 17% were unsure. Surprisingly, a few had not signed a consent form (8%), 11% were not informed of treatment risks, and 18% were not told how to respond to complications. A large majority expressed support for enhanced oversight, with 57.8% favoring significantly stricter regulation, and 31.3% somewhat stricter regulation. Conclusions Cosmetic BoNT can offer high satisfaction and a favorable safety profile when administered appropriately. However, findings highlight key vulnerabilities: inconsistent practitioner qualifications, gaps in informed consent, insufficient complication support, and weak regulation. Level of Evidence:3 (Therapeutic)

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open ForumVol. 7
Ceres (US), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Universidad Loyola Andalucía (ES), Cheshire West and Chester (GB), Universidad Loyola (BO), Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KR), Ministry of Health (MZ), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.