Overview of fuel retention and recovery in JET deuterium–tritium operation

Abstract Tritium inventory build-up is a safety and economic issue for next step fusion devices and power plants. JET with a beryllium wall and tungsten divertor brings a unique contribution on fuel retention and recovery in a metallic device, as it has operated with deuterium, tritium and deuterium–tritium (DT) plasmas. This paper documents the JET fuel retention programme and results focusing on the tritium, DT campaigns and tritium clean-up in 2023. In addition specific experimental details are presented in order to provide lessons learned for fuel retention and inventory assessment procedures for regulators and operators of future fusion devices. Fuel retention results from gas balance and Laser-Induced Desorption with gas detection using Quadrupole Mass Spectrometers (LID-QMS) are discussed. Gas balance has shown that there is no significant isotopic dependence of in-vessel global fuel retention, however a faster decrease in outgassing rate has been observed with increasing mass, likely associated with the difference in concentration and depth profile of tritium and deuterium. LID-QMS data has provided new local in-vessel fuel retention data demonstrating capability for measuring fuel retention, monitoring changes in fuel retention during an operating period as well as providing direct measurement of increased near-surface fuel concentration due to diffusion of hydrogen isotopes to the surface at elevated baking temperature and removal of fuel by inner strike point heating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Fusion
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ae094f
Primary Topic
Fusion materials and technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overview of fuel retention and recovery in JET deuterium–tritium operation

T. Dittmar, A. Widdowson, M. Zlobinski, T. Wauters et al.
Nuclear Fusion
Fusion materials and technologies
article

Overview of fuel retention and recovery in JET deuterium–tritium operation

T. Dittmar, A. Widdowson, M. Zlobinski, T. Wauters, Paul A. Staniec, Y. Zayachuk, R. Rayaprolu, S. Silburn, A. Tookey, D. Matveev, H. Weisen, E. Tsitrone, G. Sergienko, Rongxing Yi, H.J. Sun, S. Brezinsek, Richard William Walker, I. Jepu, D. Kos, D. Douai, R. Felton, K. Krieger, A. Hakola, Y. Corre, G. Gervasini, Laura Laguardia, E. Joffrin, Marie-Line Mayoral, Alan T. Peacock, R. J. Knipe, M. Van Hook, A.D. Wilcox, Giannakis Papadopoulos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Tritium inventory build-up is a safety and economic issue for next step fusion devices and power plants. JET with a beryllium wall and tungsten divertor brings a unique contribution on fuel retention and recovery in a metallic device, as it has operated with deuterium, tritium and deuterium–tritium (DT) plasmas. This paper documents the JET fuel retention programme and results focusing on the tritium, DT campaigns and tritium clean-up in 2023. In addition specific experimental details are presented in order to provide lessons learned for fuel retention and inventory assessment procedures for regulators and operators of future fusion devices. Fuel retention results from gas balance and Laser-Induced Desorption with gas detection using Quadrupole Mass Spectrometers (LID-QMS) are discussed. Gas balance has shown that there is no significant isotopic dependence of in-vessel global fuel retention, however a faster decrease in outgassing rate has been observed with increasing mass, likely associated with the difference in concentration and depth profile of tritium and deuterium. LID-QMS data has provided new local in-vessel fuel retention data demonstrating capability for measuring fuel retention, monitoring changes in fuel retention during an operating period as well as providing direct measurement of increased near-surface fuel concentration due to diffusion of hydrogen isotopes to the surface at elevated baking temperature and removal of fuel by inner strike point heating.

Nuclear FusionVol. 65(11)
ITER (FR), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), CEA Cadarache (FR), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (DE), Institute for the Science and Technology of Plasmas (IT), United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (GB), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Fusion materials and technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.