Towards an affective post-foundational political geography

This paper develops an affective post-foundational political geography to better attend to how affects might shape, and be shaped by, political processes. It foregrounds (extra)ordinary affects, sensory experiences, and atmospheres as central to how politics is felt, encountered, and experienced in nonlinear ways that exceed discourse. Attuning to affects, this paper enables human geographers to better engage with ordinary events as they unfold, traverse political registers, and potentially surface in extraordinary moments. This framework offers epistemological insight into how difference can be affectively registered and negotiated within political processes, while building points of connection between critical geography and activist praxis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Human Geography
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251378214
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an affective post-foundational political geography

Niamh Nelson-Owens
Progress in Human Geography
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Towards an affective post-foundational political geography

Niamh Nelson-Owens
article en

Abstract

This paper develops an affective post-foundational political geography to better attend to how affects might shape, and be shaped by, political processes. It foregrounds (extra)ordinary affects, sensory experiences, and atmospheres as central to how politics is felt, encountered, and experienced in nonlinear ways that exceed discourse. Attuning to affects, this paper enables human geographers to better engage with ordinary events as they unfold, traverse political registers, and potentially surface in extraordinary moments. This framework offers epistemological insight into how difference can be affectively registered and negotiated within political processes, while building points of connection between critical geography and activist praxis.

Progress in Human GeographyVol. 50(2)
University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.