SHOULD WE TREAT NON-HUMAN ANIMALS WELL BECAUSE THEY HAVE RIGHTS, INTERESTS, NEITHER, OR BOTH?

With the common occurrences of animal right campaigns and numerous laws that have been passed to benefit animals, the idea that we should treat non-human animals well is widespread in 2025. Many believe that treating animals well is morally right but are unsure about the philosophical reasoning behind why animals should be treated well. This essay will tackle this question in three steps to provide an answer. First, I will establish a viable theory on animal ethics to explain why (some) animals matter. Second, I will discuss why these animals should be treated well. I will first look at rights which I define as entitlements to own something or to perform certain actions and then look at interests which I define as what arouses the mind, regardless of whether it is essential for survival or not. Ultimately, I will conclude that although the fact that (some) animals have interests wouldn’t be an incorrect answer, the best answer would be neither rights or interests but sentience because it is fundamental to both interests and rights.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal and Plant Biology
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61784/japb3006
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SHOULD WE TREAT NON-HUMAN ANIMALS WELL BECAUSE THEY HAVE RIGHTS, INTERESTS, NEITHER, OR BOTH?

Journal of Animal and Plant Biology
Animal testing and alternatives
article

SHOULD WE TREAT NON-HUMAN ANIMALS WELL BECAUSE THEY HAVE RIGHTS, INTERESTS, NEITHER, OR BOTH?

article en

Abstract

With the common occurrences of animal right campaigns and numerous laws that have been passed to benefit animals, the idea that we should treat non-human animals well is widespread in 2025. Many believe that treating animals well is morally right but are unsure about the philosophical reasoning behind why animals should be treated well. This essay will tackle this question in three steps to provide an answer. First, I will establish a viable theory on animal ethics to explain why (some) animals matter. Second, I will discuss why these animals should be treated well. I will first look at rights which I define as entitlements to own something or to perform certain actions and then look at interests which I define as what arouses the mind, regardless of whether it is essential for survival or not. Ultimately, I will conclude that although the fact that (some) animals have interests wouldn’t be an incorrect answer, the best answer would be neither rights or interests but sentience because it is fundamental to both interests and rights.

Journal of Animal and Plant BiologyVol. 2(1)
Latifa Hospital (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SHOULD WE TREAT NON-HUMAN ANIMALS WELL BECAUSE THEY HAVE RIGHTS, INTERESTS, NEITHER, OR BOTH? · Journal of Animal and Plant Biology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS