The Wheels of Scientific Progress: Integrative Theory Building in Decision Science

Abstract: We put forward a collaborative research program for integrative theory building in psychology. As an example, we consider the field of decision science. Our approach involves testing general principles deduced from multiple theories rather than testing local theories against each other. A structurally fixed but generic research paradigm allows for incorporating a wide range of variables and a sound comparison of results. The goal is to arrive at a powerful theory reliably explaining a maximum of variance with a minimum of causal principles proposed. To achieve this, empirical research is organized in a strictly competitive fashion so that candidate factors are always assessed in competition to a set of fundamental principles that already survived a supervised replication procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Wheels of Scientific Progress: Integrative Theory Building in Decision Science

Tilmann Betsch, Arndt Bröder
1 citations
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.11
article

The Wheels of Scientific Progress: Integrative Theory Building in Decision Science

Tilmann Betsch, Arndt Bröder
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: We put forward a collaborative research program for integrative theory building in psychology. As an example, we consider the field of decision science. Our approach involves testing general principles deduced from multiple theories rather than testing local theories against each other. A structurally fixed but generic research paradigm allows for incorporating a wide range of variables and a sound comparison of results. The goal is to arrive at a powerful theory reliably explaining a maximum of variance with a minimum of causal principles proposed. To achieve this, empirical research is organized in a strictly competitive fashion so that candidate factors are always assessed in competition to a set of fundamental principles that already survived a supervised replication procedure.

Zeitschrift für PsychologieVol. 233(4)
University of Mannheim (DE), University of Erfurt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.