Evaluating the performance of CE-QUAL-W2 version 4.5 sediment diagenesis model

Abstract. This research evaluates the performance of the CE-QUAL-W2 v4.5 sediment diagenesis model in simulating water temperature, dissolved oxygen, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll a, and biochemical oxygen demand in a Portuguese reservoir over a six-year period (2016–2021). The model was calibrated using 35 observed profiles of temperature and dissolved oxygen, as well as six annual measurements of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and biochemical oxygen demand at multiple depths. To benchmark performance to the sediment diagenesis model, three alternative sediment oxygen demand formulations – a Zero-order, First-order, and a Hybrid model combining both approaches – were also implemented and compared. All models achieved NSE and RMSE values within or near the ranges reported in the literature, effectively capturing the system's water quality dynamics. Among them, the Hybrid model yielded the best overall performance while maintaining a simpler structure (Water temperature – NSE: 0.96±0.18; RMSE: 1.09±0.23 °C; Dissolved oxygen – NSE: 0.76±0.30; RMSE: 1.87±0.72 mg L−1). The sediment diagenesis model exhibited similar performance metrics (Water temperature – NSE: 0.95±0.18; RMSE: 1.13±0.28 °C; Dissolved oxygen – NSE: 0.71±0.14; RMSE: 2.01±0.59 mg L−1). Overall, the results suggest that the diagenesis model may be better suited for capturing detailed process-based dynamics over extended timeframes, whereas simpler models, such as the Hybrid model, are more appropriate for short- to medium-term applications or situations with limited data availability. Hopefully, the results of this study will help improve water management strategies by supporting more informed model selection tailored to the temporal scope and data constraints of reservoir monitoring programs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6135-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the performance of CE-QUAL-W2 version 4.5 sediment diagenesis model

Manuel Almeida, Pedro Coelho
1 citations
Geoscientific model development
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

Evaluating the performance of CE-QUAL-W2 version 4.5 sediment diagenesis model

Manuel Almeida, Pedro Coelho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. This research evaluates the performance of the CE-QUAL-W2 v4.5 sediment diagenesis model in simulating water temperature, dissolved oxygen, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll a, and biochemical oxygen demand in a Portuguese reservoir over a six-year period (2016–2021). The model was calibrated using 35 observed profiles of temperature and dissolved oxygen, as well as six annual measurements of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and biochemical oxygen demand at multiple depths. To benchmark performance to the sediment diagenesis model, three alternative sediment oxygen demand formulations – a Zero-order, First-order, and a Hybrid model combining both approaches – were also implemented and compared. All models achieved NSE and RMSE values within or near the ranges reported in the literature, effectively capturing the system's water quality dynamics. Among them, the Hybrid model yielded the best overall performance while maintaining a simpler structure (Water temperature – NSE: 0.96±0.18; RMSE: 1.09±0.23 °C; Dissolved oxygen – NSE: 0.76±0.30; RMSE: 1.87±0.72 mg L−1). The sediment diagenesis model exhibited similar performance metrics (Water temperature – NSE: 0.95±0.18; RMSE: 1.13±0.28 °C; Dissolved oxygen – NSE: 0.71±0.14; RMSE: 2.01±0.59 mg L−1). Overall, the results suggest that the diagenesis model may be better suited for capturing detailed process-based dynamics over extended timeframes, whereas simpler models, such as the Hybrid model, are more appropriate for short- to medium-term applications or situations with limited data availability. Hopefully, the results of this study will help improve water management strategies by supporting more informed model selection tailored to the temporal scope and data constraints of reservoir monitoring programs.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(18)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.