Hybrid ARIMA-LSTM for COVID-19 forecasting: a comparative AI modeling study

Pandemics present critical challenges to global health systems, economies, and societal structures, necessitating the development of accurate forecasting models for effective intervention and resource allocation. Classical statistical models such as the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) have been widely employed in epidemiological forecasting; however, they struggle to capture the nonlinear trends and dynamic fluctuations inherent in pandemic data. Conversely, deep learning models such as long short-term memory (LSTM) networks demonstrate strong capabilities in modeling complex dependencies but often require substantial data and computational resources. To boost forecasting precision, hybrid models such as ARIMA-LSTM integrate the advantages of traditional and deep learning methods. This study evaluates and compares the performance of ARIMA, LSTM, and hybrid ARIMA-LSTM models in predicting pandemic trends, using COVID-19 data from the Malaysian Ministry of Health as a case study. The dataset covers the period from 4 January 2021 to 18 September 2021, and model performance is evaluated using key metrics, including mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), relative root mean squared error (RRMSE), normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>). The results demonstrate that ARIMA performs poorly in capturing pandemic trends, while LSTM improves forecasting accuracy. However, the hybrid ARIMA-LSTM model consistently achieves the lowest error rates, confirming the advantage of integrating statistical and deep learning methodologies. All findings support the adoption of hybrid modeling approaches for pandemic forecasting, contributing to more accurate and reliable predictive analytics in epidemiology. Future research should investigate the generalizability of hybrid models across various infectious diseases and integrate additional real-time external variables to improve forecasting reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3195
Citations
5
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid ARIMA-LSTM for COVID-19 forecasting: a comparative AI modeling study

Ashwini M Madawana, Mohamad Arif Awang Nawi, A. Mahmud, Sarah Noor et al.
5 citations
PeerJ Computer Science
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
6.80
article

Hybrid ARIMA-LSTM for COVID-19 forecasting: a comparative AI modeling study

Ashwini M Madawana, Mohamad Arif Awang Nawi, A. Mahmud, Sarah Noor, Kamarul Imran Musa, Noorshaida Kamaruddin, Firdaus Mohamad Hamzah, Zainab Mat Yudin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Pandemics present critical challenges to global health systems, economies, and societal structures, necessitating the development of accurate forecasting models for effective intervention and resource allocation. Classical statistical models such as the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) have been widely employed in epidemiological forecasting; however, they struggle to capture the nonlinear trends and dynamic fluctuations inherent in pandemic data. Conversely, deep learning models such as long short-term memory (LSTM) networks demonstrate strong capabilities in modeling complex dependencies but often require substantial data and computational resources. To boost forecasting precision, hybrid models such as ARIMA-LSTM integrate the advantages of traditional and deep learning methods. This study evaluates and compares the performance of ARIMA, LSTM, and hybrid ARIMA-LSTM models in predicting pandemic trends, using COVID-19 data from the Malaysian Ministry of Health as a case study. The dataset covers the period from 4 January 2021 to 18 September 2021, and model performance is evaluated using key metrics, including mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean squared error (RMSE), relative root mean squared error (RRMSE), normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>). The results demonstrate that ARIMA performs poorly in capturing pandemic trends, while LSTM improves forecasting accuracy. However, the hybrid ARIMA-LSTM model consistently achieves the lowest error rates, confirming the advantage of integrating statistical and deep learning methodologies. All findings support the adoption of hybrid modeling approaches for pandemic forecasting, contributing to more accurate and reliable predictive analytics in epidemiology. Future research should investigate the generalizability of hybrid models across various infectious diseases and integrate additional real-time external variables to improve forecasting reliability.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 11
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), National Defence University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
6.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.