The Miraculous and the Monstrous in the Discourse on Nature of the XVII Century

The spheres of the miraculous and monstrous are older than science, and perhaps even older than conceptual language. They belong to the reality of metaphors, or even deep emotions, therefore, in relation to science, their use, at first glance, seems evaluative and superfluous, because they do not refer to specific objects, labels and categories, but to what precedes any codification and cataloging phe­nomena, namely – moods. Nevertheless, the community of scientists, at the turn of the early Modern period developing as a group with distinctive behavior, habits and attitudes, cannot be adequately assessed outside the symbolic context, including in relation to the coordinates of the miraculous and monstrous, such value categories as hopes and fears. An example of this is the treatise “On Ly­canthropy, Transformation and Ecstasy of Witches” published by Jean de Ny­nauld in Paris in 1615, in which the werewolf becomes a basis for a number of fundamental appeals and tasks: a new approach to the amazing, to the imagi­nary, to the terrifying. To understand the meaning and significance of the questions posed in the treatise, the article carries out an analysis of specific embodiments of sensitivity to the miraculous and monstrous: from paradoxographs to the organi­zation of storefronts, from the art of automatons to symbolic construction accord­ing to speculative rules. It is shown how a community of scientists gets access to social attitudes and imagination, how their practices begin to define and form interest in the society, how the amazing is monopolized by science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy filosofii
Published
2025-03-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-3-48-59
Primary Topic
Historical and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Miraculous and the Monstrous in the Discourse on Nature of the XVII Century

Konstantin A. Ocheretyany
Voprosy filosofii
Historical and Literary Studies
article

The Miraculous and the Monstrous in the Discourse on Nature of the XVII Century

Konstantin A. Ocheretyany
article en

Abstract

The spheres of the miraculous and monstrous are older than science, and perhaps even older than conceptual language. They belong to the reality of metaphors, or even deep emotions, therefore, in relation to science, their use, at first glance, seems evaluative and superfluous, because they do not refer to specific objects, labels and categories, but to what precedes any codification and cataloging phe­nomena, namely – moods. Nevertheless, the community of scientists, at the turn of the early Modern period developing as a group with distinctive behavior, habits and attitudes, cannot be adequately assessed outside the symbolic context, including in relation to the coordinates of the miraculous and monstrous, such value categories as hopes and fears. An example of this is the treatise “On Ly­canthropy, Transformation and Ecstasy of Witches” published by Jean de Ny­nauld in Paris in 1615, in which the werewolf becomes a basis for a number of fundamental appeals and tasks: a new approach to the amazing, to the imagi­nary, to the terrifying. To understand the meaning and significance of the questions posed in the treatise, the article carries out an analysis of specific embodiments of sensitivity to the miraculous and monstrous: from paradoxographs to the organi­zation of storefronts, from the art of automatons to symbolic construction accord­ing to speculative rules. It is shown how a community of scientists gets access to social attitudes and imagination, how their practices begin to define and form interest in the society, how the amazing is monopolized by science.

Voprosy filosofii(3)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Historical and Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.