Multi-dimensional Comparison of Legal Aid System for Vulnerable Groups in China and Britain in Structure, Mechanism and Efficiency

This paper focuses on the legal aid system for disadvantaged groups in China and Britain. Through multi-dimensional comparative analysis, it aims to deeply explore the characteristics and differences of the two countries' systems, and tap the enlightenment of the British system to China. The research shows that, in terms of institutional framework, China builds its system by statute law, and the judicial administrative department leads the service network; The combination of British statute law and case law emphasizes independent supervision and market-oriented operation in management. In terms of operational mechanism, China's application review focuses on identity and the nature of the case, case assignment is dominated by institutions, and quality supervision is dominated by administrative departments; Britain pays attention to economic and case review, adopts market-oriented assignment and relies on the supervision of independent evaluation agencies. In terms of efficiency, the number of recipients and cases in China has increased significantly, and it has achieved good results in safeguarding rights and interests and social stability; British cases are diverse in types and have great international influence, which plays an outstanding role in dispute resolution and judicial efficiency improvement. Drawing lessons from British experience, China can improve its legislation system and enhance its operability and foresight; Introducing multiple modes in management and operation mechanism, optimizing assignment and supervision; Expand the network and strengthen the utilization of resources on the integration of service network and resources. In the future, China should learn from the experience based on the national conditions, improve the legal aid system, ensure social fairness and justice, and promote harmonious development.