Models of the Relationship Between Corporate and Individual Identity

The article discusses options for the relationship between corporate and individual images in the minds of an employee. The very understanding of “image” is clarified and its components are highlighted. The main problem, as seen by the authors of this article, is that often an employee has contradictions between his own vision of his image and the image of the organization (or team) in which he works. This gives rise to difficulties associated with the loss of professional identity, the risks of professional destruction, as well as erroneous personnel decisions if the employee’s image is not based on business success, but on a false assessment of his real qualifications and dubious personal characteristics. A generalized model of the relationship between individual and corporate image is proposed, based on taking into account the acceptance or rejection by a specific employee of his image and the image of his organization, which allows us to distinguish four main statuses: the status of “alien” for an employee of the organization; harmonious status; the status of the employee’s external and internal identity conflict; status when the employee himself perceives himself as an “alien” in the organization. For each of these statuses, generalized recommendations are offered: options for management decisions for managers dealing with employees who are “disoriented” in their images; options for career actions for employees seeking to either maintain their “harmonious” statuses, or trying to resolve their contradictions between their individual and corporate image.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-4-57-64
Primary Topic
Employer Branding and e-HRM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Models of the Relationship Between Corporate and Individual Identity

Elena V. Kamneva, N. S. Pryazhnikov
Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University
Employer Branding and e-HRM
article

Models of the Relationship Between Corporate and Individual Identity

Elena V. Kamneva, N. S. Pryazhnikov
article en

Abstract

The article discusses options for the relationship between corporate and individual images in the minds of an employee. The very understanding of “image” is clarified and its components are highlighted. The main problem, as seen by the authors of this article, is that often an employee has contradictions between his own vision of his image and the image of the organization (or team) in which he works. This gives rise to difficulties associated with the loss of professional identity, the risks of professional destruction, as well as erroneous personnel decisions if the employee’s image is not based on business success, but on a false assessment of his real qualifications and dubious personal characteristics. A generalized model of the relationship between individual and corporate image is proposed, based on taking into account the acceptance or rejection by a specific employee of his image and the image of his organization, which allows us to distinguish four main statuses: the status of “alien” for an employee of the organization; harmonious status; the status of the employee’s external and internal identity conflict; status when the employee himself perceives himself as an “alien” in the organization. For each of these statuses, generalized recommendations are offered: options for management decisions for managers dealing with employees who are “disoriented” in their images; options for career actions for employees seeking to either maintain their “harmonious” statuses, or trying to resolve their contradictions between their individual and corporate image.

Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial UniversityVol. 15(4)
Financial University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Employer Branding and e-HRM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.