Historical and Neocolonial Dimensions of Territorial Disputes: The Impact of Colonial Borders on the Present

This article examines the historical evolution of border formation, emphasizing the critical influence of political, economic, and social factors across the colonial, postcolonial, and neocolonial eras. During the colonial period, European powers imposed artificial boundaries with little regard for indigenous ethnic, cultural, or geographic realities, creating enduring fault lines in regions such as Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East. The postcolonial era saw the application of the principle of uti possidetis juris, which sought to preserve colonial boundaries to avoid territorial chaos but inadvertently exacerbated ethnic tensions and territorial disputes. In the neocolonial phase, although direct political control diminished, former colonial powers maintained influence through economic mechanisms and multinational corporations, further complicating boundary issues. The article highlights how weaker states, driven by national identity and prestige, often pursue boundary claims against more powerful actors, resulting in persistent regional instability. Comparative analysis reveals that in Asia and the Middle East, border disputes tend to escalate into militarized conflicts more frequently than in Africa, where confrontations often remain localized. Although international law provides a framework for maintaining borders, the colonial legacy continues to challenge its effectiveness. The study argues for the necessity of integrated solutions that address historical, socio-cultural, and political dimensions to achieve sustainable peace and regional cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-4-42-48
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historical and Neocolonial Dimensions of Territorial Disputes: The Impact of Colonial Borders on the Present

Nikolay A. Medushevskii, Mehmet Açıkgöz
Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University
International Maritime Law Issues
article

Historical and Neocolonial Dimensions of Territorial Disputes: The Impact of Colonial Borders on the Present

Nikolay A. Medushevskii, Mehmet Açıkgöz
article en

Abstract

This article examines the historical evolution of border formation, emphasizing the critical influence of political, economic, and social factors across the colonial, postcolonial, and neocolonial eras. During the colonial period, European powers imposed artificial boundaries with little regard for indigenous ethnic, cultural, or geographic realities, creating enduring fault lines in regions such as Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East. The postcolonial era saw the application of the principle of uti possidetis juris, which sought to preserve colonial boundaries to avoid territorial chaos but inadvertently exacerbated ethnic tensions and territorial disputes. In the neocolonial phase, although direct political control diminished, former colonial powers maintained influence through economic mechanisms and multinational corporations, further complicating boundary issues. The article highlights how weaker states, driven by national identity and prestige, often pursue boundary claims against more powerful actors, resulting in persistent regional instability. Comparative analysis reveals that in Asia and the Middle East, border disputes tend to escalate into militarized conflicts more frequently than in Africa, where confrontations often remain localized. Although international law provides a framework for maintaining borders, the colonial legacy continues to challenge its effectiveness. The study argues for the necessity of integrated solutions that address historical, socio-cultural, and political dimensions to achieve sustainable peace and regional cooperation.

Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial UniversityVol. 15(4)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Historical and Neocolonial Dimensions of Territorial Disputes: The Impact of Colonial Borders on the Present — Nikolay A. Medushevskii, Mehmet Açıkgöz · Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS