Community-based management expands ecosystem protection footprint in Amazonian forests

Community-based conservation has gained traction in the Brazilian Amazon because of its potential in combining territorial protection, local well-being and biodiversity conservation. We assessed the footprint of effective protection, areas actively monitored and defended through community-led surveillance, where illegal activities such as poaching, fishing and logging are successfully prevented, within the largest community-based fisheries conservation arrangement in the Amazon. While the arrangement focused specifically on 13 lakes which were on average 47 ha in size, the effectively protected floodplain area was approximately eightfold larger than the extent of direct protection, defined as the immediate focal area sustaining financial returns through co-management. The additional protection of this ‘functional area’ was on average 11,188 ha, or 36-fold larger than the directly protected area. Although the average cost of effective protection was low (US$0.95 ha−1 yr−1), this was entirely incurred by low-income local communities. Our study underscores the remarkable effort leveraged by Amazonian rural communities in protecting natural ecosystems and the imperative need to develop compensation mechanisms to financially reward them, which are currently lacking. Community-based conservation efforts for ecosystems can have manifold effects beyond the direct areas being managed. This study finds that, deep in the Amazon, communities effectively protected an area 36 times larger than the area they were guarding, but also had to bear all of the costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Sustainability
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01633-6
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-based management expands ecosystem protection footprint in Amazonian forests

Richard J. Ladle, Hugo C. M. Costa, Eduardo S. Brondízio, Ana Carla Rodrigues et al.
5 citations
Nature Sustainability
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
article

Community-based management expands ecosystem protection footprint in Amazonian forests

Richard J. Ladle, Hugo C. M. Costa, Eduardo S. Brondízio, Ana Carla Rodrigues, Ana C. M. Malhado, Carlos A. Peres, João Vitor Campos‐Silva, J. A. de Moraes, Pedro de Araújo Lima Constantino, Adevaldo Dias
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Community-based conservation has gained traction in the Brazilian Amazon because of its potential in combining territorial protection, local well-being and biodiversity conservation. We assessed the footprint of effective protection, areas actively monitored and defended through community-led surveillance, where illegal activities such as poaching, fishing and logging are successfully prevented, within the largest community-based fisheries conservation arrangement in the Amazon. While the arrangement focused specifically on 13 lakes which were on average 47 ha in size, the effectively protected floodplain area was approximately eightfold larger than the extent of direct protection, defined as the immediate focal area sustaining financial returns through co-management. The additional protection of this ‘functional area’ was on average 11,188 ha, or 36-fold larger than the directly protected area. Although the average cost of effective protection was low (US$0.95 ha−1 yr−1), this was entirely incurred by low-income local communities. Our study underscores the remarkable effort leveraged by Amazonian rural communities in protecting natural ecosystems and the imperative need to develop compensation mechanisms to financially reward them, which are currently lacking. Community-based conservation efforts for ecosystems can have manifold effects beyond the direct areas being managed. This study finds that, deep in the Amazon, communities effectively protected an area 36 times larger than the area they were guarding, but also had to bear all of the costs.

Nature SustainabilityVol. 8(11)
University of East Anglia (GB), US Forest Service (US), Instituto Biológico (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR), Yale University (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), AgroBio (BR), Instituto Maria e Joao Aleixo (BR), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (BR), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR), Universidade Federal de Alagoas (BR)
U.S. Department of State, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, National Geographic Society, Rolex, US-UK Fulbright Commission, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas, Brazilian Biodivesity Fund, International Conservation Fund of Canada, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.