Comparison of adsorption mechanisms of tungstate ions on different clay minerals

Tungsten, widely used in industry, can cause ecological risks like soil degradation and plant growth inhibition due to its migration and accumulation in the environment. Studying its adsorption mechanisms helps understand its transformation laws, accurately evaluate ecological risks, and develop control strategies. This study combines first-principles simulations based on DFT (density functional theory) with experiments to explore the different adsorption behaviors of tungsten (WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup>) on three clay minerals: kaolinite, montmorillonite, and illite. Adsorption experiments show that lowering the solution pH, increasing the initial concentration, and extending the adsorption time all enhance WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> adsorption on the three minerals. A higher pH increases the negative charge on the minerals' surfaces, boosting electrostatic repulsion and reducing WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> adsorption. Adsorption kinetics and isotherm studies indicate that the adsorption process on the three minerals follows pseudo-second-order kinetics and the Langmuir model, suggesting chemisorption dominance. The adsorption rate for WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> is illite > kaolinite > montmorillonite, while the adsorption capacity at equilibrium is montmorillonite > kaolinite > illite. First-principles studies reveal that WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> forms one Al-O coordination bond (1.889 Å) on kaolinite (001), two Si-O bonds (1.799 Å, 1.889 Å) on montmorillonite, and two Si-O bonds (both 1.800 Å) on illite (001). The adsorption of WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> on the (001) faces of these minerals is mainly chemisorption, with adsorption energies of -166.94 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> (kaolinite), -178.52 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> (montmorillonite), and -112.65 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> (illite). WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> adsorbs most easily on montmorillonite (001) due to its lowest adsorption energy and highest stability, followed by kaolinite (001), and least easily on illite (001).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RSC Advances
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra04306a
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of adsorption mechanisms of tungstate ions on different clay minerals

Ming Chen, Xinjuan Chen, Yuru Dong, Jie Xiao et al.
1 citations
RSC Advances
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
0.54
article

Comparison of adsorption mechanisms of tungstate ions on different clay minerals

Ming Chen, Xinjuan Chen, Yuru Dong, Jie Xiao, Nan Wang, Yang Liu, Hao Wu, Jie Liu, Yuping Chen, Jiale Chen, Fu Liu, Peng Yang, Ziqin Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Tungsten, widely used in industry, can cause ecological risks like soil degradation and plant growth inhibition due to its migration and accumulation in the environment. Studying its adsorption mechanisms helps understand its transformation laws, accurately evaluate ecological risks, and develop control strategies. This study combines first-principles simulations based on DFT (density functional theory) with experiments to explore the different adsorption behaviors of tungsten (WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup>) on three clay minerals: kaolinite, montmorillonite, and illite. Adsorption experiments show that lowering the solution pH, increasing the initial concentration, and extending the adsorption time all enhance WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> adsorption on the three minerals. A higher pH increases the negative charge on the minerals' surfaces, boosting electrostatic repulsion and reducing WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> adsorption. Adsorption kinetics and isotherm studies indicate that the adsorption process on the three minerals follows pseudo-second-order kinetics and the Langmuir model, suggesting chemisorption dominance. The adsorption rate for WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> is illite > kaolinite > montmorillonite, while the adsorption capacity at equilibrium is montmorillonite > kaolinite > illite. First-principles studies reveal that WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> forms one Al-O coordination bond (1.889 Å) on kaolinite (001), two Si-O bonds (1.799 Å, 1.889 Å) on montmorillonite, and two Si-O bonds (both 1.800 Å) on illite (001). The adsorption of WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> on the (001) faces of these minerals is mainly chemisorption, with adsorption energies of -166.94 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> (kaolinite), -178.52 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> (montmorillonite), and -112.65 kJ mol<sup>-1</sup> (illite). WO<sub>4</sub> <sup>2-</sup> adsorbs most easily on montmorillonite (001) due to its lowest adsorption energy and highest stability, followed by kaolinite (001), and least easily on illite (001).

RSC AdvancesVol. 15(41)
Ministry of Natural Resources (RW), Jiangxi Applied Engineering Vocational Institute (CN), Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Radioactive element chemistry and processing
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.