The Great Patriotic War in Digital Media

The discourse of the Great Patriotic War has long been defined by the opposition of feat and loss, paradoxically combining the two extremes. However, this oppo­sition was formed within the framework of Halbwaks’ dichotomy of “history – collective memory”, and did not take into account a completely different format of communication in the digital environment. Representing by its very nature the violence of the past, digital memory at the same time represented a reaction to this violence: the discourse of trauma. For this reason, as time passes, the sub­ject of the Great Patriotic War begins to lean imperceptibly towards a greater representation of this phenomenon, as we can observe in recent video games: the abstract soldiers of the war strategies of 2000s are replaced first by more concrete (but still abstract) tanks and airplanes of 2010s, and in 2020s by more narrative-oriented stories of civilians facing war as a traumatic fact of existence. At the same time, the voice of the local community, muffled by historical dis­course, suddenly finds a new channel of representation, even in the form of a ghost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy filosofii
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2025-5-26-34
Primary Topic
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Great Patriotic War in Digital Media

Daniil Budaev
Voprosy filosofii
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
article

The Great Patriotic War in Digital Media

Daniil Budaev
article en

Abstract

The discourse of the Great Patriotic War has long been defined by the opposition of feat and loss, paradoxically combining the two extremes. However, this oppo­sition was formed within the framework of Halbwaks’ dichotomy of “history – collective memory”, and did not take into account a completely different format of communication in the digital environment. Representing by its very nature the violence of the past, digital memory at the same time represented a reaction to this violence: the discourse of trauma. For this reason, as time passes, the sub­ject of the Great Patriotic War begins to lean imperceptibly towards a greater representation of this phenomenon, as we can observe in recent video games: the abstract soldiers of the war strategies of 2000s are replaced first by more concrete (but still abstract) tanks and airplanes of 2010s, and in 2020s by more narrative-oriented stories of civilians facing war as a traumatic fact of existence. At the same time, the voice of the local community, muffled by historical dis­course, suddenly finds a new channel of representation, even in the form of a ghost.

Voprosy filosofii(5)
Pushkin Leningrad State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Great Patriotic War in Digital Media — Daniil Budaev · Voprosy filosofii (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS