The Sustainability Dimension for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF): Comparing Regional and International Approaches

The deployment of Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs) is central to decarbonizing aviation. However, diverse regulatory frameworks create complexity for SAF market deployment. Differing greenhouse gas (GHG)-reduction thresholds, feedstock eligibility rules and certification systems increase the compliance burden, especially for those operating across regional and international markets. This paper compares an example of regional approach (European) with the international ICAO sustainability certification. The comparison focuses on chain-of-custody models, substantiality principles, GHG accounting methodologies and approaches to ILUC. It highlights the need for harmonized GHG calculation rules, mutual recognition of certification schemes and interoperable traceability systems. Aligning these elements is critical for reducing administrative barriers, supporting market integration and enabling scalable SAF deployment. The analysis aims to assist policymakers, certifiers and producers in developing coordinated and transparent regulatory strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188401
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sustainability Dimension for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF): Comparing Regional and International Approaches

Matteo Prussi
1 citations
Sustainability
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
1.11
article

The Sustainability Dimension for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF): Comparing Regional and International Approaches

Matteo Prussi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The deployment of Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAFs) is central to decarbonizing aviation. However, diverse regulatory frameworks create complexity for SAF market deployment. Differing greenhouse gas (GHG)-reduction thresholds, feedstock eligibility rules and certification systems increase the compliance burden, especially for those operating across regional and international markets. This paper compares an example of regional approach (European) with the international ICAO sustainability certification. The comparison focuses on chain-of-custody models, substantiality principles, GHG accounting methodologies and approaches to ILUC. It highlights the need for harmonized GHG calculation rules, mutual recognition of certification schemes and interoperable traceability systems. Aligning these elements is critical for reducing administrative barriers, supporting market integration and enabling scalable SAF deployment. The analysis aims to assist policymakers, certifiers and producers in developing coordinated and transparent regulatory strategies.

SustainabilityVol. 17(18)
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.