Optimizing the Societal Value of Tort Law by Meeting Justice Needs of All Stakeholders: Towards Restorative Tort Law

With their traditional focus on financial compensation, tort law systems worldwide struggle with the adverse effects the claims resolution process can have on victims of personal injury. It has therefore been argued that tort law systems should be more emotionally intelligent and more mindful of the non-financial needs of victims. In this debate, the perspective of the wrongdoer has been largely neglected. Drawing from empirical research on the personal experiences of wrongdoers in the Dutch personal injury practice and building on theories of procedural and restorative justice, this contribution argues that, to optimize the societal value of tort law systems, attention should be paid to the wrongdoer’s perspective. A tort law system that lacks sufficient opportunity for wrongdoers to personally make amends is deficient both in terms of morality and justice, as it deprives both victims and wrongdoers of a chance at emotional and moral recovery from the injurious event. We therefore believe this represents a shared future for all of us: towards restorative tort law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laws
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14050068
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the Societal Value of Tort Law by Meeting Justice Needs of All Stakeholders: Towards Restorative Tort Law

A.J. Akkermans, F.M. Ruitenbeek-Bart
1 citations
Laws
Legal principles and applications
15.98
article

Optimizing the Societal Value of Tort Law by Meeting Justice Needs of All Stakeholders: Towards Restorative Tort Law

A.J. Akkermans, F.M. Ruitenbeek-Bart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With their traditional focus on financial compensation, tort law systems worldwide struggle with the adverse effects the claims resolution process can have on victims of personal injury. It has therefore been argued that tort law systems should be more emotionally intelligent and more mindful of the non-financial needs of victims. In this debate, the perspective of the wrongdoer has been largely neglected. Drawing from empirical research on the personal experiences of wrongdoers in the Dutch personal injury practice and building on theories of procedural and restorative justice, this contribution argues that, to optimize the societal value of tort law systems, attention should be paid to the wrongdoer’s perspective. A tort law system that lacks sufficient opportunity for wrongdoers to personally make amends is deficient both in terms of morality and justice, as it deprives both victims and wrongdoers of a chance at emotional and moral recovery from the injurious event. We therefore believe this represents a shared future for all of us: towards restorative tort law.

LawsVol. 14(5)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal principles and applications
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.