Unmasking review usefulness: How central, peripheral, and product cues shape consumer perception in online travel reviews

This study explores how central cues, peripheral cues, and product-related signals influence the perceived usefulness of online reviews in the tourism sector. Using a large dataset of 1,544,920 reviews from Ctrip.com, the study employs advanced analytical methods, including text mining and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression, to test the proposed hypotheses. The research reveals that factors like review valence, readability, length, and images significantly affect review usefulness. Reviewer self-disclosure (e.g., name, location, face visibility) further enhances usefulness by increasing credibility. Readability and scenic popularity moderate the impact of review valence. Negative reviews are more useful when readability is high, while scenic popularity reduces the difference between positive and negative reviews. This study extends theoretical frameworks and offers practical insights for platforms to promote credible, high-quality reviews.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105556
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmasking review usefulness: How central, peripheral, and product cues shape consumer perception in online travel reviews

Jianhua Liu, Guang Yang, Jinwen Tang, Xunyong Xiao
1 citations
Acta Psychologica
Digital Marketing and Social Media
4.20
article

Unmasking review usefulness: How central, peripheral, and product cues shape consumer perception in online travel reviews

Jianhua Liu, Guang Yang, Jinwen Tang, Xunyong Xiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explores how central cues, peripheral cues, and product-related signals influence the perceived usefulness of online reviews in the tourism sector. Using a large dataset of 1,544,920 reviews from Ctrip.com, the study employs advanced analytical methods, including text mining and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression, to test the proposed hypotheses. The research reveals that factors like review valence, readability, length, and images significantly affect review usefulness. Reviewer self-disclosure (e.g., name, location, face visibility) further enhances usefulness by increasing credibility. Readability and scenic popularity moderate the impact of review valence. Negative reviews are more useful when readability is high, while scenic popularity reduces the difference between positive and negative reviews. This study extends theoretical frameworks and offers practical insights for platforms to promote credible, high-quality reviews.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 260
Krirk University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.