What are the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms? A systematic review and thematic synthesis

In recent years, there has been an increase in people using websites, social media groups and mobile apps to connect with potential sperm donors or recipients. We undertook a systematic review of existing research which sought to: explore the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms; assess the quality of the existing literature; identify gaps in the evidence base; and make recommendations for future research. Ten academic and grey literature databases and search engines (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Core, Google Scholar, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, NICE Evidence, Open Grey and Google) were searched in December 2019 and again in June 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and we undertook a thematic synthesis of the findings. The searches produced 18,614 results, of which 30 reports were included in the synthesis. The reports were published between 2010 and 2024, by authors from nine countries, and were qualitative (<i>n =</i> 19), quantitative (<i>n =</i> 7) and mixed methods (<i>n =</i> 4) in design. Four themes and two subthemes pertaining to participants' motivations and experiences were constructed from the data. The themes demonstrate that OSD is an improvised practice that is laden with stigma and can produce imbalances of power between donors and recipients. The findings point to a need for further research, including prospective research, to be undertaken with more diverse samples, including populations in the Global South, Black and minority ethnic populations, and inexperienced donors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Fertility
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2025.2553529
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms? A systematic review and thematic synthesis

Georgina Jones, Rhys Turner‐Moore, Francesca Taylor, Georgina Forshall
3 citations
Human Fertility
Reproductive Health and Technologies
5.09
article

What are the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms? A systematic review and thematic synthesis

Georgina Jones, Rhys Turner‐Moore, Francesca Taylor, Georgina Forshall
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increase in people using websites, social media groups and mobile apps to connect with potential sperm donors or recipients. We undertook a systematic review of existing research which sought to: explore the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms; assess the quality of the existing literature; identify gaps in the evidence base; and make recommendations for future research. Ten academic and grey literature databases and search engines (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Core, Google Scholar, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, NICE Evidence, Open Grey and Google) were searched in December 2019 and again in June 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and we undertook a thematic synthesis of the findings. The searches produced 18,614 results, of which 30 reports were included in the synthesis. The reports were published between 2010 and 2024, by authors from nine countries, and were qualitative (<i>n =</i> 19), quantitative (<i>n =</i> 7) and mixed methods (<i>n =</i> 4) in design. Four themes and two subthemes pertaining to participants' motivations and experiences were constructed from the data. The themes demonstrate that OSD is an improvised practice that is laden with stigma and can produce imbalances of power between donors and recipients. The findings point to a need for further research, including prospective research, to be undertaken with more diverse samples, including populations in the Global South, Black and minority ethnic populations, and inexperienced donors.

Human FertilityVol. 28(1)
Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
5.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.