Intelligent Face Recognition: Comprehensive Feature Extraction Methods for Holistic Face Analysis and Modalities

Face recognition technology utilizes unique facial features to analyze and compare individuals for identification and verification purposes. This technology is crucial for several reasons, such as improving security and authentication, effectively verifying identities, providing personalized user experiences, and automating various operations, including attendance monitoring, access management, and law enforcement activities. In this paper, comprehensive evaluations are conducted using different face detection and modality segmentation methods, feature extraction methods, and classifiers to improve system performance. As for face detection, four methods are proposed: OpenCV’s Haar Cascade classifier, Dlib’s HOG + SVM frontal face detector, Dlib’s CNN face detector, and Mediapipe’s face detector. Additionally, two types of feature extraction techniques are proposed: hand-crafted features (traditional methods: global local features) and deep learning features. Three global features were extracted, Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Speeded Robust Features (SURF), and Global Image Structure (GIST). Likewise, the following local feature methods are utilized: Local Binary Pattern (LBP), Weber local descriptor (WLD), and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG). On the other hand, the deep learning-based features fall into two categories: convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including VGG16, VGG19, and VGG-Face, and Siamese neural networks (SNNs), which generate face embeddings. For classification, three methods are employed: Support Vector Machine (SVM), a one-class SVM variant, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The system is evaluated on three datasets: in-house, Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW), and the Pins dataset (sourced from Pinterest) providing comprehensive benchmark comparisons for facial recognition research. The best performance accuracy for the proposed ten-feature extraction methods applied to the in-house database in the context of the facial recognition task achieved 99.8% accuracy by using the VGG16 model combined with the SVM classifier.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Signals
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/signals6030049
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligent Face Recognition: Comprehensive Feature Extraction Methods for Holistic Face Analysis and Modalities

Jabir Alshehabi Al-Ani, Musab T. S. Al-Kaltakchi, Ahmad Saeed Mohammad, Thoalfeqar G. Jarullah
1 citations
Signals
Face recognition and analysis
1.28
article

Intelligent Face Recognition: Comprehensive Feature Extraction Methods for Holistic Face Analysis and Modalities

Jabir Alshehabi Al-Ani, Musab T. S. Al-Kaltakchi, Ahmad Saeed Mohammad, Thoalfeqar G. Jarullah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Face recognition technology utilizes unique facial features to analyze and compare individuals for identification and verification purposes. This technology is crucial for several reasons, such as improving security and authentication, effectively verifying identities, providing personalized user experiences, and automating various operations, including attendance monitoring, access management, and law enforcement activities. In this paper, comprehensive evaluations are conducted using different face detection and modality segmentation methods, feature extraction methods, and classifiers to improve system performance. As for face detection, four methods are proposed: OpenCV’s Haar Cascade classifier, Dlib’s HOG + SVM frontal face detector, Dlib’s CNN face detector, and Mediapipe’s face detector. Additionally, two types of feature extraction techniques are proposed: hand-crafted features (traditional methods: global local features) and deep learning features. Three global features were extracted, Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Speeded Robust Features (SURF), and Global Image Structure (GIST). Likewise, the following local feature methods are utilized: Local Binary Pattern (LBP), Weber local descriptor (WLD), and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG). On the other hand, the deep learning-based features fall into two categories: convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including VGG16, VGG19, and VGG-Face, and Siamese neural networks (SNNs), which generate face embeddings. For classification, three methods are employed: Support Vector Machine (SVM), a one-class SVM variant, and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The system is evaluated on three datasets: in-house, Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW), and the Pins dataset (sourced from Pinterest) providing comprehensive benchmark comparisons for facial recognition research. The best performance accuracy for the proposed ten-feature extraction methods applied to the in-house database in the context of the facial recognition task achieved 99.8% accuracy by using the VGG16 model combined with the SVM classifier.

SignalsVol. 6(3)
York St John University (GB), Mustansiriyah University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Face recognition and analysis
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.