Initial Changes in Ground Beetle (Carabidae: Coleoptera) Assemblages after Creating Gaps of Varying Sizes in Mature Northern Hardwoods Forests in Wisconsin

Managers of northern hardwood forests in the Great Lakes region create gaps in the forest canopy of various sizes during harvesting to achieve different silvicultural objectives. Single-tree harvesting favors recruitment of shade-tolerant tree species by creating small gaps in the canopy, whereas group selection creates larger gaps that can favor shade-intolerant tree species. We evaluated changes in carabid beetle abundance and diversity in harvest-created gaps of five sizes (gap diameters of 6, 10, 20, 30, and 46 m) and uncut forests in northern Wisconsin where sugar maple (Acer saccharum) was the dominant tree species. Gaps were cut during the fall/winter of 1994 and 1995. Pitfall traps were used to sample carabids during the summers of 1994 (pre-harvesting) and 1997 (2nd or 3rd summer post-harvesting). Overall, 27,111 carabids (60 species) were collected in both years, with 15,036 (25 species) collected in 1994 and 12,075 (55 species) collected in 1997. Carabid species richness increased while catch rate decreased with increasing gap size. Similarly, as gap size increased, carabid abundance declined for forest specialists but increased for open-habitat species. The carabid assemblages in the 6- and 10-m-diameter gaps were most like the intact forest, while those in the 30- and 46-m-diameter gaps were most distinct. Results are discussed in terms of harvesting strategies in northern hardwood forests to maintain high biodiversity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Great Lakes Entomologist
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22543/0090-0222.2506
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Initial Changes in Ground Beetle (Carabidae: Coleoptera) Assemblages after Creating Gaps of Varying Sizes in Mature Northern Hardwoods Forests in Wisconsin

Robert E. Acciavatti, Robert A. Haack, Robert L. Davidson, Terry F. Strong et al.
The Great Lakes Entomologist
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
article

Initial Changes in Ground Beetle (Carabidae: Coleoptera) Assemblages after Creating Gaps of Varying Sizes in Mature Northern Hardwoods Forests in Wisconsin

Robert E. Acciavatti, Robert A. Haack, Robert L. Davidson, Terry F. Strong, Toby R. Petrice
article en

Abstract

Managers of northern hardwood forests in the Great Lakes region create gaps in the forest canopy of various sizes during harvesting to achieve different silvicultural objectives. Single-tree harvesting favors recruitment of shade-tolerant tree species by creating small gaps in the canopy, whereas group selection creates larger gaps that can favor shade-intolerant tree species. We evaluated changes in carabid beetle abundance and diversity in harvest-created gaps of five sizes (gap diameters of 6, 10, 20, 30, and 46 m) and uncut forests in northern Wisconsin where sugar maple (Acer saccharum) was the dominant tree species. Gaps were cut during the fall/winter of 1994 and 1995. Pitfall traps were used to sample carabids during the summers of 1994 (pre-harvesting) and 1997 (2nd or 3rd summer post-harvesting). Overall, 27,111 carabids (60 species) were collected in both years, with 15,036 (25 species) collected in 1994 and 12,075 (55 species) collected in 1997. Carabid species richness increased while catch rate decreased with increasing gap size. Similarly, as gap size increased, carabid abundance declined for forest specialists but increased for open-habitat species. The carabid assemblages in the 6- and 10-m-diameter gaps were most like the intact forest, while those in the 30- and 46-m-diameter gaps were most distinct. Results are discussed in terms of harvesting strategies in northern hardwood forests to maintain high biodiversity.

The Great Lakes EntomologistVol. 58(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.