Data analytics for error detection in clinical laboratories

Errors inevitably occur in the practice of laboratory medicine. A cornerstone of clinical laboratory quality management is the detection of erroneous results and the assessment of imprecision, bias, and other performance limitations of clinical test methods, particularly those affecting patient care. Errors can arise in each of what has been conventionally regarded as the three key phases of testing: pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical. In this review, both the standard concepts and methods of quantifying uncertainty and error are introduced in the context of clinical laboratory operations. Method validation and verification studies are presented as opportunities for preemptive and anticipatory error assessment-before tests are implemented for patient testing. Quality control monitoring is a key internal quality assurance strategy, whereas proficiency testing forms the basis of most external quality assurance initiatives. Data analytic approaches for error detection are reviewed, highlighting quantitative and statistical concepts on which they are based, and emerging machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms are presented as contemporary tools currently under development for error detection in the clinical laboratory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2555261
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data analytics for error detection in clinical laboratories

Clarence W. Chan
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Data analytics for error detection in clinical laboratories

Clarence W. Chan
article en

Abstract

Errors inevitably occur in the practice of laboratory medicine. A cornerstone of clinical laboratory quality management is the detection of erroneous results and the assessment of imprecision, bias, and other performance limitations of clinical test methods, particularly those affecting patient care. Errors can arise in each of what has been conventionally regarded as the three key phases of testing: pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical. In this review, both the standard concepts and methods of quantifying uncertainty and error are introduced in the context of clinical laboratory operations. Method validation and verification studies are presented as opportunities for preemptive and anticipatory error assessment-before tests are implemented for patient testing. Quality control monitoring is a key internal quality assurance strategy, whereas proficiency testing forms the basis of most external quality assurance initiatives. Data analytic approaches for error detection are reviewed, highlighting quantitative and statistical concepts on which they are based, and emerging machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms are presented as contemporary tools currently under development for error detection in the clinical laboratory.

Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.