Using machine learning to automate data annotation in corpus linguistics

Abstract A wealth of linguistic data has been annotated by corpus linguists, and this extant annotated data can be used to automatically replicate and apply the linguist’s annotation scheme by means of machine learning models. This paper accompanies the release of documented code notebooks, which allow corpus linguists to use manually categorized examples or ‘training data’ as input for a predictive language model. By means of a case study of Early Modern English - ing forms, we describe how the predictive language model MacBERTh can be used to accurately replicate the manual data classification scheme employed in previous corpus linguistic studies. Additionally, we discuss how manual error analysis and post-correction may help improve the model’s output. By openly releasing the data and code used in this paper, we hope to stimulate the use of machine learning models such as MacBERTh in corpus linguistics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22088.fon
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using machine learning to automate data annotation in corpus linguistics

Enrique Manjavacas, Jaleesa De Regt, Lauren Fonteyn
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Using machine learning to automate data annotation in corpus linguistics

Enrique Manjavacas, Jaleesa De Regt, Lauren Fonteyn
article en

Abstract

Abstract A wealth of linguistic data has been annotated by corpus linguists, and this extant annotated data can be used to automatically replicate and apply the linguist’s annotation scheme by means of machine learning models. This paper accompanies the release of documented code notebooks, which allow corpus linguists to use manually categorized examples or ‘training data’ as input for a predictive language model. By means of a case study of Early Modern English - ing forms, we describe how the predictive language model MacBERTh can be used to accurately replicate the manual data classification scheme employed in previous corpus linguistic studies. Additionally, we discuss how manual error analysis and post-correction may help improve the model’s output. By openly releasing the data and code used in this paper, we hope to stimulate the use of machine learning models such as MacBERTh in corpus linguistics.

International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 30(3)
Australian National University (AU), Leiden University (NL), Meertens Institute (NL), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using machine learning to automate data annotation in corpus linguistics — Enrique Manjavacas, Jaleesa De Regt, et al. · International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS