A comparison between two moth surveys on the farm Zandrivier 559, Lephalale, Limpopo, South Africa.

Two moth surveys conducted during March, a year apart, in the same locality, using a standard protocol, allowed for the gathering of comparative data. The number of specimens and the number of species recorded were almost identical from year to year but the actual species count increased from 264 to 401, an increase of 52%. The high increase in species may be simply an indication of the inefficiency of the sampling method to assess the species richness of an area. Other factors such as the possible influence of differential seasonal rainfall on moth numbers, distance between trap sites and the influence of short adult flight periods are discussed. No definitive conclusions could be reached to explain the high increase in species recorded from year to year. The results from this study questions the validity of species richness assesments for highly diverse taxa such as Lepidoptera, based on short term surveys and cautions their unequivocal use as a benchmark in Environmental Impact Assesments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Metamorphosis
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/met.v26i1.11
Primary Topic
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison between two moth surveys on the farm Zandrivier 559, Lephalale, Limpopo, South Africa.

Hermann S. Staude
Metamorphosis
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
article

A comparison between two moth surveys on the farm Zandrivier 559, Lephalale, Limpopo, South Africa.

Hermann S. Staude
article en

Abstract

Two moth surveys conducted during March, a year apart, in the same locality, using a standard protocol, allowed for the gathering of comparative data. The number of specimens and the number of species recorded were almost identical from year to year but the actual species count increased from 264 to 401, an increase of 52%. The high increase in species may be simply an indication of the inefficiency of the sampling method to assess the species richness of an area. Other factors such as the possible influence of differential seasonal rainfall on moth numbers, distance between trap sites and the influence of short adult flight periods are discussed. No definitive conclusions could be reached to explain the high increase in species recorded from year to year. The results from this study questions the validity of species richness assesments for highly diverse taxa such as Lepidoptera, based on short term surveys and cautions their unequivocal use as a benchmark in Environmental Impact Assesments.

MetamorphosisVol. 26(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison between two moth surveys on the farm Zandrivier 559, Lephalale, Limpopo, South Africa. — Hermann S. Staude · Metamorphosis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS