Submesoscale Eddies Identified by SWOT and Their Comparison with Mesoscale Eddies in the Tropical Western Pacific

Conventional altimeter satellites, such as TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason series, can identify ocean mesoscale eddies (MEs) but cannot effectively distinguish submesoscale eddies (SMEs) due to horizontal resolution limitations. The emergence of the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite has enabled the resolution (or detection) of SMEs. At present, Data Unification and Altimeter Combination System (DUACS) (MEs-resolving) and SWOT (SMEs-resolving) satellites operate concurrently in orbit, however a systematic comparison and analysis of their observational outputs has yet to be conducted. Using a closed-contour scalar analysis method, this study identifies SMEs in the tropical western Pacific Ocean and compares the results with those from the dataset. The latitude-dependent Rossby deformation radius is employed to differentiate MEs from SMEs. For MEs, SWOT detects 176 per 10.5-day sub-cycle, while DUACS detects 162, which are roughly equivalent. For SMEs, SWOT identifies 273 per sub-cycle, far exceeding the 13 detected by DUACS. For amplitudes, DUACS measures 5.22 cm and 3.67 cm for MEs and SMEs, respectively, while the values reported by the SWOT satellite are 6.13 cm and 4.49 cm. In both datasets, cyclonic eddies are more prevalent in all cases except for the SMEs detected by SWOT, where anticyclonic eddies slightly outnumber cyclonic eddies. Additionally, during the trial operation and scientific orbit phases, SWOT is able to resolve 29 SMEs per orbit. The results indicate that high-resolution data can distinguish phenomena that conventional satellite altimeters cannot capture, providing valuable references for the analysis and application of SME characteristics.