Debris Simulation in Controlled Demolition of Tall Building Structures: Solid Model-Based Approach

This article presents a unique study on the demolition process of a high-rise reinforced concrete building simulated using a methodology based on the Applied Element Method (AEM). Prior to the parametric analyses, the progressive collapse-based solid model was visually validated against real-world controlled demolition footage captured by both Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and fixed cameras, showing close agreement in building motion and debris dispersion patterns. In contrast to the Finite Element Method (FEM) model, the simulation is not blast-induced; it is instead developed on a column removal approach, which is widely adopted in progressive collapse assessments. Discussions related to the FEM model are provided as well. The parametric analysis is conducted in two stages. First, a constant removal sequence (removal of 4, 3, and 2 floors, respectively, in the first, second, and third axes) is applied to both 20- and 15-storey buildings under three time delays: 100 ms, 300 ms, and 500 ms. Based on these results, a 300 ms delay is identified as a suitable compromise for controlling debris dispersion, and this value is adopted for the subsequent analyses. In the second stage, three distinct removal sequences are examined on the 20-storey structure using the fixed 300 ms delay: Scenario 1 (4–3–2), Scenario 2 (12–8–6), and Scenario 3 (16–12–6). Among these, Scenario 3 yields the most compact horizontal debris spread. The findings indicate a strong correlation between the actual demolition behavior and the proposed model, demonstrating its capability to realistically capture complex structural failure mechanisms and provide practical guidance for optimizing controlled demolition strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183396
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debris Simulation in Controlled Demolition of Tall Building Structures: Solid Model-Based Approach

Jülide Yüzbaşı
6 citations
Buildings
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
5.72
article

Debris Simulation in Controlled Demolition of Tall Building Structures: Solid Model-Based Approach

Jülide Yüzbaşı
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This article presents a unique study on the demolition process of a high-rise reinforced concrete building simulated using a methodology based on the Applied Element Method (AEM). Prior to the parametric analyses, the progressive collapse-based solid model was visually validated against real-world controlled demolition footage captured by both Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and fixed cameras, showing close agreement in building motion and debris dispersion patterns. In contrast to the Finite Element Method (FEM) model, the simulation is not blast-induced; it is instead developed on a column removal approach, which is widely adopted in progressive collapse assessments. Discussions related to the FEM model are provided as well. The parametric analysis is conducted in two stages. First, a constant removal sequence (removal of 4, 3, and 2 floors, respectively, in the first, second, and third axes) is applied to both 20- and 15-storey buildings under three time delays: 100 ms, 300 ms, and 500 ms. Based on these results, a 300 ms delay is identified as a suitable compromise for controlling debris dispersion, and this value is adopted for the subsequent analyses. In the second stage, three distinct removal sequences are examined on the 20-storey structure using the fixed 300 ms delay: Scenario 1 (4–3–2), Scenario 2 (12–8–6), and Scenario 3 (16–12–6). Among these, Scenario 3 yields the most compact horizontal debris spread. The findings indicate a strong correlation between the actual demolition behavior and the proposed model, demonstrating its capability to realistically capture complex structural failure mechanisms and provide practical guidance for optimizing controlled demolition strategies.

BuildingsVol. 15(18)
Cukurova University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.