Assessing the Effects of Species, Origin, and Processing on Frog Leg Meat Composition with Predictive Modeling Tools

This study investigates the effects of species, geographical origin, and processing on the proximate composition of frog leg meat, with a focus on developing predictive models for processing status. Data were systematically compiled from 18 published studies, yielding 32 entries across 10 edible frog species and multiple processing methods. Proximate composition parameters (moisture, protein, fat, ash) were compared between processed and unprocessed samples, and classification models were trained using moisture content as the primary predictor. Logistic regression and several machine learning algorithms, including Stochastic Gradient Descent, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Decision Tree, were benchmarked under a Leave-One-Study-Out (LOSO) cross-validation framework. Results demonstrated that moisture content alone was sufficient to accurately distinguish processing status, with a critical threshold of ~73% separating processed from unprocessed frog legs. Logistic regression achieved perfect specificity and precision (100%) with an overall accuracy of 96.8%, while other classifiers also performed strongly (>90% accuracy). These findings confirm moisture as a species- and origin-independent marker of processing, offering a simple, rapid, and cost-effective tool for authenticity verification and quality control in frog meat and potentially other niche protein products. Future work should expand sample coverage, validate thresholds across processing types, and integrate biochemical and sensory quality assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fishes
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10090466
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Effects of Species, Origin, and Processing on Frog Leg Meat Composition with Predictive Modeling Tools

Marianthi Chatziioannou, Dimitris Klaoudatos, Efkarpia Kougiagka
Fishes
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Assessing the Effects of Species, Origin, and Processing on Frog Leg Meat Composition with Predictive Modeling Tools

Marianthi Chatziioannou, Dimitris Klaoudatos, Efkarpia Kougiagka
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of species, geographical origin, and processing on the proximate composition of frog leg meat, with a focus on developing predictive models for processing status. Data were systematically compiled from 18 published studies, yielding 32 entries across 10 edible frog species and multiple processing methods. Proximate composition parameters (moisture, protein, fat, ash) were compared between processed and unprocessed samples, and classification models were trained using moisture content as the primary predictor. Logistic regression and several machine learning algorithms, including Stochastic Gradient Descent, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Decision Tree, were benchmarked under a Leave-One-Study-Out (LOSO) cross-validation framework. Results demonstrated that moisture content alone was sufficient to accurately distinguish processing status, with a critical threshold of ~73% separating processed from unprocessed frog legs. Logistic regression achieved perfect specificity and precision (100%) with an overall accuracy of 96.8%, while other classifiers also performed strongly (>90% accuracy). These findings confirm moisture as a species- and origin-independent marker of processing, offering a simple, rapid, and cost-effective tool for authenticity verification and quality control in frog meat and potentially other niche protein products. Future work should expand sample coverage, validate thresholds across processing types, and integrate biochemical and sensory quality assessments.

FishesVol. 10(9)
University of Thessaly (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.