Temporary Anchorage Devices for the Replacement of Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisors in Growing Patients: An Integrative Systematic Review and a Case Study

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the use of orthodontic mini-implants (MIs) as temporary anchorage devices (TADs), with particular focus on how insertion angulation may influence clinical outcomes. A clinical case report was also included to complement the review findings. Methods: A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines and a focused PICO question. Searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, supplemented by manual screening of reference lists. Duplicates, systematic reviews, and studies outside the PICO scope were excluded. An observational analysis of CBCT and intraoral images, and a clinical case report, were evaluated with a standardized protocol for angulation classification based on anatomical landmarks and angular measurements. Results: Ten studies met the eligibility criteria. Most reported high survival rates, with stability defined by the absence of TAD mobility or loss. CBCT-derived data from two studies, together with one clinical case, demonstrated maintenance of alveolar bone. Improved outcomes were occasionally associated with changes in insertion angulation. Vertical positioning was more frequently linked to complications in shorter TADs, while horizontal placement preserved bone but introduced hygiene-related difficulties. Conclusions: TAD success and bone preservation may depend on insertion angulation, TAD size, and soft tissue conditions. Further standardized prospective studies are needed to validate these findings, particularly regarding intermediate diagonal insertion angles (between vertical and horizontal) extending from palatal to buccal, as observed in our clinical case, which is not yet reported in the literature.