Mind the Gap: Sex-Specific Drivers of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake in Serbian University Students

Despite proven effectiveness, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake remains suboptimal in many countries. The aim of this study was to explore differences in beliefs about HPV and HPV vaccination, the information environment and social influences shaping vaccination decisions between male and female undergraduate university students in Belgrade, and to identify sex-specific factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake. A cross-sectional study was conducted between April and December 2024. An online questionnaire was completed by 1529 female and 423 male students who were either receiving their second or third dose of the nonavalent HPV vaccine, or accessing general healthcare services at the general medicine department of the Institute for Students' Health of Belgrade. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify predictors of HPV vaccine uptake in male and female students. Among female students, HPV vaccine uptake was associated with stronger beliefs in vaccine efficacy (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.50-2.69) and safety (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.69-3.10), lower perceived lack of information (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60-0.84), and social influence of family members, (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.03), colleagues (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.01-2.59) and media (OR = 1.92, CI: 1.10-3.37). Among male students, vaccine uptake was associated with stronger beliefs in vaccine efficacy (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.37-3.34), lower perceived lack of information (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.98), more frequent reliance on scientific literature (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.15-1.97) and family (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.07-1.75) and less frequent use of YouTube (OR = 0.70, CI: 0.53-0.92) as sources of information, and social influence of family (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.03-3.24). This study highlights significant sex differences in factors influencing HPV vaccine uptake, indicating that tailored approach is required in designing vaccine promotion strategies. Strengthening communication on efficacy and safety, improving access to reliable information, and addressing sex-specific concerns such as safety and financial barriers in females and misinformation in males could improve uptake and equitable HPV protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15090189
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind the Gap: Sex-Specific Drivers of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake in Serbian University Students

Smiljana Cvjetković, Snezana Ristic, Stefan Mandić‐Rajčević, Vida Jeremić Stojković et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
4.33
article

Mind the Gap: Sex-Specific Drivers of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake in Serbian University Students

Smiljana Cvjetković, Snezana Ristic, Stefan Mandić‐Rajčević, Vida Jeremić Stojković, Dejana Vuković, Marija Obradović, Mila Paunić
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite proven effectiveness, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake remains suboptimal in many countries. The aim of this study was to explore differences in beliefs about HPV and HPV vaccination, the information environment and social influences shaping vaccination decisions between male and female undergraduate university students in Belgrade, and to identify sex-specific factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake. A cross-sectional study was conducted between April and December 2024. An online questionnaire was completed by 1529 female and 423 male students who were either receiving their second or third dose of the nonavalent HPV vaccine, or accessing general healthcare services at the general medicine department of the Institute for Students' Health of Belgrade. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify predictors of HPV vaccine uptake in male and female students. Among female students, HPV vaccine uptake was associated with stronger beliefs in vaccine efficacy (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.50-2.69) and safety (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.69-3.10), lower perceived lack of information (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60-0.84), and social influence of family members, (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.03), colleagues (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.01-2.59) and media (OR = 1.92, CI: 1.10-3.37). Among male students, vaccine uptake was associated with stronger beliefs in vaccine efficacy (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.37-3.34), lower perceived lack of information (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.98), more frequent reliance on scientific literature (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.15-1.97) and family (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.07-1.75) and less frequent use of YouTube (OR = 0.70, CI: 0.53-0.92) as sources of information, and social influence of family (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.03-3.24). This study highlights significant sex differences in factors influencing HPV vaccine uptake, indicating that tailored approach is required in designing vaccine promotion strategies. Strengthening communication on efficacy and safety, improving access to reliable information, and addressing sex-specific concerns such as safety and financial barriers in females and misinformation in males could improve uptake and equitable HPV protection.

European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and EducationVol. 15(9)
University of Belgrade (RS), Institute of Public Health of Serbia (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
4.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.