Effectiveness of an incentives-enhanced stepped care intervention program on diabetes prevention in a multi-ethnic Asian prediabetes cohort: results from the Pre-DICTED randomized controlled trial

<p dir="ltr">OBJECTIVE </p><p dir="ltr">Diabetes prevention in real-world settings faces challenges of intervention adherence and difficulties in sustaining behavior change. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a stepped care prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, in reducing the risk of diabetes conversion in a multi-ethnic prediabetes cohort in Singapore.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</p><p dir="ltr">The Pre-Diabetes Interventions and Continued Tracking to Ease-out Diabetes (Pre-DICTED) trial was a randomized controlled trial involving 751 overweight or obese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or both. Participants were assigned to standard care (control arm) or a stepped care intervention program, starting with lifestyle interventions for 6 months before adding metformin for participants who remained at high risk of diabetes conversion based on study visit assessments. Intervention arm participants also received financial incentives for attending lifestyle sessions and for achieving ≥5% weight loss. The primary endpoint was the proportion developing diabetes at three years in the modified intention-to-treat population. </p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">RESULTS </p><p dir="ltr">After three years, diabetes developed in 34.8% of participants in the intervention arm compared to 47.3% in the control arm (adjusted risk difference: -10.93%, 95% CI -18.04 to -3.81; p = 0.003). The adjusted relative risk was 0.74 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.88; p < 0.001). Within the intervention arm, 26.4% of participants received metformin, and 45.1% received cash incentives. Adverse events were more common in the intervention arm, mainly due to metformin-related gastrointestinal symptoms.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">CONCLUSIONS</p><p dir="ltr">A stepped care diabetes prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, effectively reduced diabetes conversion in a multi-ethnic Asian prediabetes cohort. </p>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2337/figshare.30005131
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of an incentives-enhanced stepped care intervention program on diabetes prevention in a multi-ethnic Asian prediabetes cohort: results from the Pre-DICTED randomized controlled trial

Rob M. van Dam, Mary Foong‐Fong Chong, Selly Julianty, Amanda Yun Rui Lam et al.
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Effectiveness of an incentives-enhanced stepped care intervention program on diabetes prevention in a multi-ethnic Asian prediabetes cohort: results from the Pre-DICTED randomized controlled trial

Rob M. van Dam, Mary Foong‐Fong Chong, Selly Julianty, Amanda Yun Rui Lam, Yu Qi Lee, Gilbert Choon Seng Tan, Julian Thumboo, Eric Andrew Finkelstein, Yong Mong Bee, Gavin Siew Wei Tan, Neha Awasthi, Eugene Jin Wen Shum, Mihir Gandhi, Tazeen H. Jafar, Yee Leong Teoh, Emily Tse Lin Ho, Su-Yen Goh
article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">OBJECTIVE </p><p dir="ltr">Diabetes prevention in real-world settings faces challenges of intervention adherence and difficulties in sustaining behavior change. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a stepped care prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, in reducing the risk of diabetes conversion in a multi-ethnic prediabetes cohort in Singapore.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</p><p dir="ltr">The Pre-Diabetes Interventions and Continued Tracking to Ease-out Diabetes (Pre-DICTED) trial was a randomized controlled trial involving 751 overweight or obese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, or both. Participants were assigned to standard care (control arm) or a stepped care intervention program, starting with lifestyle interventions for 6 months before adding metformin for participants who remained at high risk of diabetes conversion based on study visit assessments. Intervention arm participants also received financial incentives for attending lifestyle sessions and for achieving ≥5% weight loss. The primary endpoint was the proportion developing diabetes at three years in the modified intention-to-treat population. </p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">RESULTS </p><p dir="ltr">After three years, diabetes developed in 34.8% of participants in the intervention arm compared to 47.3% in the control arm (adjusted risk difference: -10.93%, 95% CI -18.04 to -3.81; p = 0.003). The adjusted relative risk was 0.74 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.88; p < 0.001). Within the intervention arm, 26.4% of participants received metformin, and 45.1% received cash incentives. Adverse events were more common in the intervention arm, mainly due to metformin-related gastrointestinal symptoms.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">CONCLUSIONS</p><p dir="ltr">A stepped care diabetes prevention program, enhanced with financial incentives, effectively reduced diabetes conversion in a multi-ethnic Asian prediabetes cohort. </p>

Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.