Marburg: Boris Pasternak’s turn to Igor Severyanin’s poetics

In many of Boris Pasternak’s early poems, the influence of Igor Severyanin (I. V. Lotarev) can be detected. Even their contemporaries noted that Pasternak used themes, motifs and stylistic features of the older poet. Nevertheless, as is known, Pasternak very often rewrote his poems. While reworking the early texts, Pasternak tried to partially free them from Severyanin’s imagery and style or to incorporate Severyanin’s individual techniques into his own poetics. This article shows how Pasternak changed his approaches to Severyanin’s works in two versions of Marburg — from 1916 and from 1928. In the poem’s later redaction, Pasternak, striving for “simplification”, rejected Severyanin’s “bourgeois” words and “salon” imagery that were present in the earlier version. The article classifies the ways Pasternak drew on Severyanin according to the methodology of philologist Natalia Fateeva. In the early redaction of the poem, one can notice the use of such types of intertextuality as metatextuality, borrowing of a device, sound-syllabic and morphemic types of intertext, as well as poetic paradigm. Examination of “traces” of Severyanin’s poetics in Pasternak’s work requires further study, which could provide a unified understanding of the evolution of Pasternak’s poetry in general and the topic “Pasternak and Severyanin” in particular.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/r8nzx_v1
Primary Topic
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marburg: Boris Pasternak’s turn to Igor Severyanin’s poetics

Maria Levina
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
article

Marburg: Boris Pasternak’s turn to Igor Severyanin’s poetics

Maria Levina
article en

Abstract

In many of Boris Pasternak’s early poems, the influence of Igor Severyanin (I. V. Lotarev) can be detected. Even their contemporaries noted that Pasternak used themes, motifs and stylistic features of the older poet. Nevertheless, as is known, Pasternak very often rewrote his poems. While reworking the early texts, Pasternak tried to partially free them from Severyanin’s imagery and style or to incorporate Severyanin’s individual techniques into his own poetics. This article shows how Pasternak changed his approaches to Severyanin’s works in two versions of Marburg — from 1916 and from 1928. In the poem’s later redaction, Pasternak, striving for “simplification”, rejected Severyanin’s “bourgeois” words and “salon” imagery that were present in the earlier version. The article classifies the ways Pasternak drew on Severyanin according to the methodology of philologist Natalia Fateeva. In the early redaction of the poem, one can notice the use of such types of intertextuality as metatextuality, borrowing of a device, sound-syllabic and morphemic types of intertext, as well as poetic paradigm. Examination of “traces” of Severyanin’s poetics in Pasternak’s work requires further study, which could provide a unified understanding of the evolution of Pasternak’s poetry in general and the topic “Pasternak and Severyanin” in particular.

Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Marburg: Boris Pasternak’s turn to Igor Severyanin’s poetics — Maria Levina · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS