Please Customers or Prevent Wastage? Replenishment and Issuance Policy for a Perishable Product with Age-Sensitive Demand

Problem definition: An online retailer selling a perishable product can issue inventories of different remaining lifetimes in its preferred sequence. This creates a trade-off between customer satisfaction and outdating costs since customers want freshness, whereas the retailer desires units be sold within their lifetime. We study this trade-off by considering a joint replenishment and issuance policy for a perishable product with a general lifetime. Methodology/results: We develop a periodic review model over a finite horizon and model customers’ sensitivity to the received unit’s remaining lifetime using a goodwill cost, which increases as the remaining lifetime decreases. Although customer satisfaction is likely to be maximized by the last in, first out issuance policy and the outdating cost is likely to be minimized by the first in, first out (FIFO) issuance policy, neither policy may be optimal. In particular, when the product lifetime is two periods, it is optimal to first issue new inventory until a threshold and then issue the remaining inventory in the FIFO order. Although the value function is always concave, the optimal issuance policy can become complex for longer product lifetimes. Consequently, we focus on bucket policies in which inventory of each remaining lifetime is issued in a single installment. Our experiments showcase that the best bucket policy’s profit is within 0.1% of the optimal profit on average. Motivated by this result, we develop an easy-to-compute heuristic to determine a bucket policy and order quantity and computationally show that its performance is within 1.3% of the optimal profit on average. The heuristic also outperforms many replenishment and issuance policies proposed in the literature. Furthermore, the heuristic is asymptotically optimal with respect to the unit retail price. Managerial implications: Although optimal issuance policies that capture the trade-off between customer satisfaction and wastage because of expiry can often be complex, simple, effective, and easy-to-implement issuance policies can be identified, and the performance of these policies is close to optimal. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0578 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0578
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Please Customers or Prevent Wastage? Replenishment and Issuance Policy for a Perishable Product with Age-Sensitive Demand

Achal Goyal, Amar Sapra
1 citations
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
article

Please Customers or Prevent Wastage? Replenishment and Issuance Policy for a Perishable Product with Age-Sensitive Demand

Achal Goyal, Amar Sapra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Problem definition: An online retailer selling a perishable product can issue inventories of different remaining lifetimes in its preferred sequence. This creates a trade-off between customer satisfaction and outdating costs since customers want freshness, whereas the retailer desires units be sold within their lifetime. We study this trade-off by considering a joint replenishment and issuance policy for a perishable product with a general lifetime. Methodology/results: We develop a periodic review model over a finite horizon and model customers’ sensitivity to the received unit’s remaining lifetime using a goodwill cost, which increases as the remaining lifetime decreases. Although customer satisfaction is likely to be maximized by the last in, first out issuance policy and the outdating cost is likely to be minimized by the first in, first out (FIFO) issuance policy, neither policy may be optimal. In particular, when the product lifetime is two periods, it is optimal to first issue new inventory until a threshold and then issue the remaining inventory in the FIFO order. Although the value function is always concave, the optimal issuance policy can become complex for longer product lifetimes. Consequently, we focus on bucket policies in which inventory of each remaining lifetime is issued in a single installment. Our experiments showcase that the best bucket policy’s profit is within 0.1% of the optimal profit on average. Motivated by this result, we develop an easy-to-compute heuristic to determine a bucket policy and order quantity and computationally show that its performance is within 1.3% of the optimal profit on average. The heuristic also outperforms many replenishment and issuance policies proposed in the literature. Furthermore, the heuristic is asymptotically optimal with respect to the unit retail price. Managerial implications: Although optimal issuance policies that capture the trade-off between customer satisfaction and wastage because of expiry can often be complex, simple, effective, and easy-to-implement issuance policies can be identified, and the performance of these policies is close to optimal. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0578 .

Manufacturing & Service Operations ManagementVol. 27(6)
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IN), Indian Institute of Management Udaipur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.