El consenso interamericano y el margen de apreciación nacional

This paper examines two methods or alternatives that can be used by the organs of the Inter-American Human Rights System to respect the political, economic, and social realities of each of the States that make up the System: inter-American consensus and the national margin of appreciation. To this end, the principle of subsidiarity and its dimensions –material or substantive and procedural–, international consensus –especially its scope– and the national margin of appreciation are analyzed. Then, the application of these methods by Supranational Courts –both in the European and Inter-American systems– is studied, and finally, conclusions are presented, weighing some national experiences in the jurisprudence of their Superior Courts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
REVISTA JURÍDICA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL OESTE
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64894/7hdt1e66
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

El consenso interamericano y el margen de apreciación nacional

Gustavo Antonio Mammoni
REVISTA JURÍDICA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL OESTE
Public Policy and Governance
article

El consenso interamericano y el margen de apreciación nacional

Gustavo Antonio Mammoni
article en

Abstract

This paper examines two methods or alternatives that can be used by the organs of the Inter-American Human Rights System to respect the political, economic, and social realities of each of the States that make up the System: inter-American consensus and the national margin of appreciation. To this end, the principle of subsidiarity and its dimensions –material or substantive and procedural–, international consensus –especially its scope– and the national margin of appreciation are analyzed. Then, the application of these methods by Supranational Courts –both in the European and Inter-American systems– is studied, and finally, conclusions are presented, weighing some national experiences in the jurisprudence of their Superior Courts.

REVISTA JURÍDICA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL OESTE(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Public Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.