A Hybrid Evaluation Approach: Incorporating Multiple Cultures Into Evaluation Design

Culturally responsive evaluation contests the presumed universality of Western-derived evaluation methods and emphasises the importance of adapting evaluation methods to be context-sensitive. It prioritises respect for the values of the communities participating in an evaluation and mutual empowerment. While there are evaluation methods and approaches that reflect Indigenous ways of knowing and experience, and frameworks for identifying the cultural positioning of communities, a challenge for evaluators is how to bring these together and apply them in an evaluation. In today’s globalised societies, there are many political, religious, cultural, social and other influences that determine people’s behaviour. A further challenge for evaluators is how to practise evaluation so that the multiple ways of knowing and being underpinning these influences can be reflected in evaluation design. This article discusses the role of culturally responsive evaluation in redressing colonial and institutional inequities that can be perpetuated by evaluation. It then describes a seven-step hybrid evaluation approach that enables diverse world views to be incorporated into evaluation design, suggesting that the approach could contribute to tackling inequities. Finally, the article discusses how this hybrid approach could assist evaluators in designing bespoke methods that reflect the world views of communities participating in an evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719x251377529
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Hybrid Evaluation Approach: Incorporating Multiple Cultures Into Evaluation Design

Heather Worth, K Hong, Bridget Haire, Kathryn Dinh
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

A Hybrid Evaluation Approach: Incorporating Multiple Cultures Into Evaluation Design

Heather Worth, K Hong, Bridget Haire, Kathryn Dinh
article en

Abstract

Culturally responsive evaluation contests the presumed universality of Western-derived evaluation methods and emphasises the importance of adapting evaluation methods to be context-sensitive. It prioritises respect for the values of the communities participating in an evaluation and mutual empowerment. While there are evaluation methods and approaches that reflect Indigenous ways of knowing and experience, and frameworks for identifying the cultural positioning of communities, a challenge for evaluators is how to bring these together and apply them in an evaluation. In today’s globalised societies, there are many political, religious, cultural, social and other influences that determine people’s behaviour. A further challenge for evaluators is how to practise evaluation so that the multiple ways of knowing and being underpinning these influences can be reflected in evaluation design. This article discusses the role of culturally responsive evaluation in redressing colonial and institutional inequities that can be perpetuated by evaluation. It then describes a seven-step hybrid evaluation approach that enables diverse world views to be incorporated into evaluation design, suggesting that the approach could contribute to tackling inequities. Finally, the article discusses how this hybrid approach could assist evaluators in designing bespoke methods that reflect the world views of communities participating in an evaluation.

Evaluation Journal of AustralasiaVol. 25(4)
Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences (VN), UNSW Sydney (AU), Institute for Social Development Studies (VN), Lotus Clinical Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.