Assessing the Influence of Temperature and Precipitation on the Yield and Losses of Key Highland Crops in Ecuador

Food production systems in Ecuador’s high Andean region are pivotal for food security, rural livelihoods, and agrobiodiversity, yet they are increasingly exposed to climate stress. We assessed four representative crops (tree tomato, quinoa, potato, and maize) across three Andean zones (North, Center, South) in 2015–2022 using monthly NASA POWER (MERRA-2) climate fields. After confirming non-normality, Spearman correlations and multiple linear regressions with leave-one-year-out validation were applied to quantify the influence of maximum/minimum temperature and precipitation on cultivated and harvested area, production, sales, and loss categories. To place monthly signals in a process context, daily extreme-event diagnostics (ETCCDI-style) were also computed: heat days (TX90), ≥5-day dry spells, and the annual maximum consecutive dry days (CDDmax). Models explained a wide range of variability across crops and zones (approx. R2∼0.55–0.99), with quinoa showing the most consistent fits (several outcomes R2>0.90). Extremes provide an eye-catching, actionable picture: the Southern zone concentrated dryness hazards, with 1–5 dry spells ≥5 days per year and CDDmax up to ∼8 days, while heat-day frequency showed non-significant declines across zones in 2015–2022. Reanalysis frost days were virtually zero—consistent with under-detection of local valley frosts at coarse resolution—so frost risk was interpreted via monthly signals and reported losses. Overall, the results show precipitation-driven vulnerabilities in the South and support quinoa’s role as a resilient option under increasing climate stress, offering concrete guidance for water management and climate-smart planning in mountain agroecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15181980
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Influence of Temperature and Precipitation on the Yield and Losses of Key Highland Crops in Ecuador

Paúl A. Chasi-Pesántez, Luis F. Guerrero-Vásquez, Jorge O. Ordoñez-Ordoñez, María del Cisne Ortega-Cabrera et al.
1 citations
Agriculture
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
6.43
article

Assessing the Influence of Temperature and Precipitation on the Yield and Losses of Key Highland Crops in Ecuador

Paúl A. Chasi-Pesántez, Luis F. Guerrero-Vásquez, Jorge O. Ordoñez-Ordoñez, María del Cisne Ortega-Cabrera, Nathalia Alexandra Chacón-Reino, Graciela del Rocío Sanmartín-Mesías
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Food production systems in Ecuador’s high Andean region are pivotal for food security, rural livelihoods, and agrobiodiversity, yet they are increasingly exposed to climate stress. We assessed four representative crops (tree tomato, quinoa, potato, and maize) across three Andean zones (North, Center, South) in 2015–2022 using monthly NASA POWER (MERRA-2) climate fields. After confirming non-normality, Spearman correlations and multiple linear regressions with leave-one-year-out validation were applied to quantify the influence of maximum/minimum temperature and precipitation on cultivated and harvested area, production, sales, and loss categories. To place monthly signals in a process context, daily extreme-event diagnostics (ETCCDI-style) were also computed: heat days (TX90), ≥5-day dry spells, and the annual maximum consecutive dry days (CDDmax). Models explained a wide range of variability across crops and zones (approx. R2∼0.55–0.99), with quinoa showing the most consistent fits (several outcomes R2>0.90). Extremes provide an eye-catching, actionable picture: the Southern zone concentrated dryness hazards, with 1–5 dry spells ≥5 days per year and CDDmax up to ∼8 days, while heat-day frequency showed non-significant declines across zones in 2015–2022. Reanalysis frost days were virtually zero—consistent with under-detection of local valley frosts at coarse resolution—so frost risk was interpreted via monthly signals and reported losses. Overall, the results show precipitation-driven vulnerabilities in the South and support quinoa’s role as a resilient option under increasing climate stress, offering concrete guidance for water management and climate-smart planning in mountain agroecosystems.

AgricultureVol. 15(18)
Politecnica Salesiana University (EC), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
6.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.