Cosmological feedback from a halo assembly perspective

The impact of feedback from galaxy formation on cosmological probes is typically quantified in terms of the suppression of the matter power spectrum in hydrodynamical compared to gravity-only simulations. In this paper, we instead study how baryonic feedback impacts halo assembly histories and thereby imprints on cosmological observables. We investigate the sensitivity of the thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect (tSZ) power spectrum, X-ray number counts, weak lensing and kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich (kSZ) stacked profiles to halo populations as a function of mass and redshift. We then study the imprint of different feedback implementations in the FLAMINGO suite of cosmological simulations on the assembly histories of these halo populations, as a function of radial scale. We find that kSZ profiles target lower-mass halos (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>M</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mn>200</a:mn><a:mtext> </a:mtext><a:mtext> </a:mtext><a:mi mathvariant="normal">m</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub><a:mo>∼</a:mo><a:msup><a:mrow><a:mn>10</a:mn></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mn>13.1</a:mn></a:mrow></a:msup><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>M</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mo stretchy="false">⊙</a:mo></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math>) compared to all other probes considered (<e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>M</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>200</e:mn><e:mtext> </e:mtext><e:mtext> </e:mtext><e:mi mathvariant="normal">m</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub><e:mo>∼</e:mo><e:msup><e:mrow><e:mn>10</e:mn></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>15</e:mn></e:mrow></e:msup><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>M</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mo stretchy="false">⊙</e:mo></e:mrow></e:msub></e:mrow></e:math>). Feedback is inefficient in high-mass clusters with <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mo>∼</i:mo><i:msup><i:mn>10</i:mn><i:mn>15</i:mn></i:msup><i:msub><i:mi>M</i:mi><i:mo stretchy="false">⊙</i:mo></i:msub></i:math> at <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mi>z</l:mi><l:mo>=</l:mo><l:mn>0</l:mn></l:math>, but was more efficient at earlier times in the same population, with a <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:mrow><n:mo>∼</n:mo><n:mn>5</n:mn><n:mi>–</n:mi><n:mn>10</n:mn><n:mo>%</n:mo></n:mrow></n:math> effect on mass at <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><p:mn>2</p:mn><p:mo>&lt;</p:mo><p:mi>z</p:mi><p:mo>&lt;</p:mo><p:mn>4</p:mn></p:math> (depending on radial scale). Conversely, for lower-mass halos with <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mo>∼</r:mo><r:msup><r:mn>10</r:mn><r:mn>13</r:mn></r:msup><r:msub><r:mi>M</r:mi><r:mo stretchy="false">⊙</r:mo></r:msub></r:math> at <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi>z</u:mi><u:mo>=</u:mo><u:mn>0</u:mn></u:math>, feedback exhibits a <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:mrow><w:mo>∼</w:mo><w:mn>5</w:mn><w:mi>–</w:mi><w:mn>20</w:mn><w:mo>%</w:mo></w:mrow></w:math> effect on mass at <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:mi>z</y:mi><y:mo>=</y:mo><y:mn>0</y:mn></y:math> but had little impact at earlier times (<ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mi>z</ab:mi><ab:mo>&gt;</ab:mo><ab:mn>2</ab:mn></ab:math>). These findings are tied together by noting that, regardless of redshift, feedback most efficiently redistributes baryons when halos reach a mass of <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:mrow><cb:msub><cb:mrow><cb:mi>M</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mn>200</cb:mn><cb:mtext> </cb:mtext><cb:mtext> </cb:mtext><cb:mi mathvariant="normal">m</cb:mi></cb:mrow></cb:msub><cb:mo>≃</cb:mo><cb:mrow><cb:msup><cb:mrow><cb:mn>10</cb:mn></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mn>12.8</cb:mn></cb:mrow></cb:msup></cb:mrow><cb:msub><cb:mrow><cb:mi>M</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mo stretchy="false">⊙</cb:mo></cb:mrow></cb:msub></cb:mrow></cb:math> and ceases to have any significant effect by the time <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><gb:mrow><gb:msub><gb:mrow><gb:mi>M</gb:mi></gb:mrow><gb:mrow><gb:mn>200</gb:mn><gb:mtext> </gb:mtext><gb:mtext> </gb:mtext><gb:mi mathvariant="normal">m</gb:mi></gb:mrow></gb:msub><gb:mo>≃</gb:mo><gb:mrow><gb:msup><gb:mrow><gb:mn>10</gb:mn></gb:mrow><gb:mrow><gb:mn>15</gb:mn></gb:mrow></gb:msup></gb:mrow><gb:msub><gb:mrow><gb:mi>M</gb:mi></gb:mrow><gb:mrow><gb:mo stretchy="false">⊙</gb:mo></gb:mrow></gb:msub></gb:mrow></gb:math>. We put forward strategies for minimizing sensitivity of lensing analyses to baryonic feedback, and for exploring baryonic resolutions to the unexpectedly low tSZ power in cosmic microwave background observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/vh8n-9cr2
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cosmological feedback from a halo assembly perspective

Hiranya V. Peiris, Willem Elbers, Joop Schaye, Andrew Pontzen et al.
5 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
5.77
article

Cosmological feedback from a halo assembly perspective

Hiranya V. Peiris, Willem Elbers, Joop Schaye, Andrew Pontzen, John C Helly, Matthieu Schaller, Luisa Lucie-Smith, Robert J. McGibbon, Anik Halder
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The impact of feedback from galaxy formation on cosmological probes is typically quantified in terms of the suppression of the matter power spectrum in hydrodynamical compared to gravity-only simulations. In this paper, we instead study how baryonic feedback impacts halo assembly histories and thereby imprints on cosmological observables. We investigate the sensitivity of the thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect (tSZ) power spectrum, X-ray number counts, weak lensing and kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich (kSZ) stacked profiles to halo populations as a function of mass and redshift. We then study the imprint of different feedback implementations in the FLAMINGO suite of cosmological simulations on the assembly histories of these halo populations, as a function of radial scale. We find that kSZ profiles target lower-mass halos (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>M</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mn>200</a:mn><a:mtext> </a:mtext><a:mtext> </a:mtext><a:mi mathvariant="normal">m</a:mi></a:mrow></a:msub><a:mo>∼</a:mo><a:msup><a:mrow><a:mn>10</a:mn></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mn>13.1</a:mn></a:mrow></a:msup><a:msub><a:mrow><a:mi>M</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mrow><a:mo stretchy="false">⊙</a:mo></a:mrow></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math>) compared to all other probes considered (<e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>M</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>200</e:mn><e:mtext> </e:mtext><e:mtext> </e:mtext><e:mi mathvariant="normal">m</e:mi></e:mrow></e:msub><e:mo>∼</e:mo><e:msup><e:mrow><e:mn>10</e:mn></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mn>15</e:mn></e:mrow></e:msup><e:msub><e:mrow><e:mi>M</e:mi></e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mo stretchy="false">⊙</e:mo></e:mrow></e:msub></e:mrow></e:math>). Feedback is inefficient in high-mass clusters with <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mo>∼</i:mo><i:msup><i:mn>10</i:mn><i:mn>15</i:mn></i:msup><i:msub><i:mi>M</i:mi><i:mo stretchy="false">⊙</i:mo></i:msub></i:math> at <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mi>z</l:mi><l:mo>=</l:mo><l:mn>0</l:mn></l:math>, but was more efficient at earlier times in the same population, with a <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><n:mrow><n:mo>∼</n:mo><n:mn>5</n:mn><n:mi>–</n:mi><n:mn>10</n:mn><n:mo>%</n:mo></n:mrow></n:math> effect on mass at <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><p:mn>2</p:mn><p:mo>&lt;</p:mo><p:mi>z</p:mi><p:mo>&lt;</p:mo><p:mn>4</p:mn></p:math> (depending on radial scale). Conversely, for lower-mass halos with <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mo>∼</r:mo><r:msup><r:mn>10</r:mn><r:mn>13</r:mn></r:msup><r:msub><r:mi>M</r:mi><r:mo stretchy="false">⊙</r:mo></r:msub></r:math> at <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:mi>z</u:mi><u:mo>=</u:mo><u:mn>0</u:mn></u:math>, feedback exhibits a <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:mrow><w:mo>∼</w:mo><w:mn>5</w:mn><w:mi>–</w:mi><w:mn>20</w:mn><w:mo>%</w:mo></w:mrow></w:math> effect on mass at <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:mi>z</y:mi><y:mo>=</y:mo><y:mn>0</y:mn></y:math> but had little impact at earlier times (<ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:mi>z</ab:mi><ab:mo>&gt;</ab:mo><ab:mn>2</ab:mn></ab:math>). These findings are tied together by noting that, regardless of redshift, feedback most efficiently redistributes baryons when halos reach a mass of <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><cb:mrow><cb:msub><cb:mrow><cb:mi>M</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mn>200</cb:mn><cb:mtext> </cb:mtext><cb:mtext> </cb:mtext><cb:mi mathvariant="normal">m</cb:mi></cb:mrow></cb:msub><cb:mo>≃</cb:mo><cb:mrow><cb:msup><cb:mrow><cb:mn>10</cb:mn></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mn>12.8</cb:mn></cb:mrow></cb:msup></cb:mrow><cb:msub><cb:mrow><cb:mi>M</cb:mi></cb:mrow><cb:mrow><cb:mo stretchy="false">⊙</cb:mo></cb:mrow></cb:msub></cb:mrow></cb:math> and ceases to have any significant effect by the time <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><gb:mrow><gb:msub><gb:mrow><gb:mi>M</gb:mi></gb:mrow><gb:mrow><gb:mn>200</gb:mn><gb:mtext> </gb:mtext><gb:mtext> </gb:mtext><gb:mi mathvariant="normal">m</gb:mi></gb:mrow></gb:msub><gb:mo>≃</gb:mo><gb:mrow><gb:msup><gb:mrow><gb:mn>10</gb:mn></gb:mrow><gb:mrow><gb:mn>15</gb:mn></gb:mrow></gb:msup></gb:mrow><gb:msub><gb:mrow><gb:mi>M</gb:mi></gb:mrow><gb:mrow><gb:mo stretchy="false">⊙</gb:mo></gb:mrow></gb:msub></gb:mrow></gb:math>. We put forward strategies for minimizing sensitivity of lensing analyses to baryonic feedback, and for exploring baryonic resolutions to the unexpectedly low tSZ power in cosmic microwave background observations.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(6)
Leiden University (NL), Universität Hamburg (DE), Stockholm University (SE), Durham University (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Leiden Observatory
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
5.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.