Investigating Primacy Bias in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: An Empirical Study
In the past two years, the phenomenon of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">primacy bias</i> in reinforcement learning has been extensively investigated, sparking discussions within the community regarding the plasticity of reinforcement learning. This study represents the first comprehensive exploration of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">primacy bias</i> in multiagent reinforcement learning. Building on our previous works, we demonstrate that multi-agent reinforcement learning also encounters the challenge of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">primacy bias</i>. We then provide a comparative analysis across various settings, including different evaluation methods, the sharing of policy parameters, and the adaptability of decentralized policies. We conducted extensive experiments on multiple multi-agent benchmarks. Our findings reveal specific characteristics of <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">primacy bias</i> in multi-agent learning, showing the difference between them with those in single-agent reinforcement learning. While, we discuss the limitations and challenges encountered when directly applying existing solutions from the reinforcement learning domain to multi-agent scenarios.
Authors
- Jingchen Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0905-0816)
- Kao‐Shing Hwang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-4836)
- Ziming He (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2218-8550)
- Huarui Wu
- Yusen Yang
- Chunjiang Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6314-7661)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2025.3560617
- Primary Topic
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00